Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update data-adapter-mixin.js #1297

Closed
wants to merge 0 commits into from
Closed

Update data-adapter-mixin.js #1297

wants to merge 0 commits into from

Conversation

bartocc
Copy link
Contributor

@bartocc bartocc commented Apr 25, 2017

Fix incorrect docs about headersForRequest being used for ember-data versions >= 2.7.
This is on hold until emberjs/rfcs#171 gets resolved

Copy link
Member

@marcoow marcoow left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

Copy link
Member

@marcoow marcoow left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hm, I think we should actually mention that headersForRequest will be used when the ds-improved-ajax feature is enabled.

@bartocc
Copy link
Contributor Author

bartocc commented Apr 25, 2017

@marcoow you mean specifically pointing to emberjs/data#3099 and not only to emberjs/rfcs#171 ?

@marcoow
Copy link
Member

marcoow commented May 31, 2017

@bartocc: sorry for the delay - I meant linking to the feature flag: https://github.com/emberjs/data/blob/master/FEATURES.md#feature-flags

@bartocc
Copy link
Contributor Author

bartocc commented Jun 7, 2017

updated @marcoow

@marcoow marcoow closed this Jun 7, 2017
@marcoow
Copy link
Member

marcoow commented Jun 7, 2017

Argh, I messed up rebasing…

Can you rebase on master?

@bartocc
Copy link
Contributor Author

bartocc commented Jun 7, 2017

I've lost the commits ... and since I edited them on GH, I don't have the in a local repo. Would you have a previous SHA by any chance ?

@marcoow
Copy link
Member

marcoow commented Jun 7, 2017

Sorry for that - created a replacement: #1366

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants