Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

the first value for the day is too high #16

Closed
daemenseth opened this issue Mar 26, 2019 · 20 comments
Closed

the first value for the day is too high #16

daemenseth opened this issue Mar 26, 2019 · 20 comments

Comments

@daemenseth
Copy link

I using this project since yesterday but todays first import is too high
it is 1800

In the logging I see also the v1 is 1800
What can cause this issue.
I have implemted the fixes from @vijghph
https://pvoutput.org/intraday.jsp?id=74365&sid=65959&dt=20190326

@X-gen76
Copy link

X-gen76 commented Apr 25, 2019

I got the same problem since 7 days ago.

@Ralf7
Copy link

Ralf7 commented Apr 27, 2019

Since April 19 I've got this issue too. See https://pvoutput.org/intraday.jsp?id=62026&sid=55213
I think something has changed on the GoodWe server, because I haven't changed anything.
I hope somebody has got a solution for this, as my solar array is facing west, I can see the real values only from 1PM on.

@walterwhite81
Copy link

walterwhite81 commented Apr 30, 2019

Same here, daily starting with a wrong value.

@vkevin85
Copy link

vkevin85 commented May 1, 2019

Same problem here, however de starting value of the day is different from day to day. Already applied the fix from vijghph but it doesn't seem to make any difference. Hopefuly someone can help to fix this issue.

@tclaer
Copy link

tclaer commented May 6, 2019

@X-gen76
Copy link

X-gen76 commented May 10, 2019

For the people how wants/needs an alternative:

https://github.com/zonoskar/Goodwe2PVoutput/

@Simanias
Copy link

Simanias commented May 24, 2019

To bad I'm having the same issue.
Besides this issue, the script works great.

@JaapBraam
Copy link
Contributor

Today this happened to me too... Yesterday I added the --skip-offline option. Maybe related?

@JaapBraam
Copy link
Contributor

I investigated:
I adapted the code to not use an average for the generated power, and now production starts at 0 kwh the next day.... I'll make a pull request for this...

@vkevin85
Copy link

Pulled the changes you made Jaap and it seems to work fine, thanks for your effort.

@X-Wizard
Copy link

X-Wizard commented Jun 12, 2019

Hi Jaap, I modified the script and it works, thanks!

2 Question,

  • How to deal with two strings (voltage), is there a possibility to sum both strings?
  • How to use the temperature value from the inverter?

markruys pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jun 13, 2019
* Fixed bug for status 'Waiting' \nStart new day with 0kWh \n Add argument --pv-voltage to send pv voltage instead of grid voltage

* fix vpv -> vpv1

* argument order
@markruys
Copy link
Owner

Looks like people are happy about #PR18, so I accepted it. Thank Jaap for you effort!

@walterwhite81
Copy link

This fixed it, thanks @JaapBraam !

@Ralf7
Copy link

Ralf7 commented Jun 16, 2019

How can I apply this fix?
I’ve tried to reinstall the package, but I received notifications of duplicate files. Then reinstalled the package with —upgrade at the end. That resulted in some errors.
Can anybody describe in easy-to-follow steps what to do?

@eNeRGy164
Copy link
Contributor

As it's not a new release yet, you would need to build the package from source code yourself

@Ralf7
Copy link

Ralf7 commented Jun 17, 2019

Ok that’s a pity, in that case I will wait until a new version comes out.

@eNeRGy164
Copy link
Contributor

Same here :)

@markruys
Copy link
Owner

I'll build a new release this evening (if don't forget it ;)

@markruys
Copy link
Owner

Build new release: https://github.com/markruys/gw2pvo/releases/tag/1.2.2

@Ralf7
Copy link

Ralf7 commented Jun 22, 2019

I installed the new release 3 days ago and it’s working like a charm! Thanks for the effort @JaapBraam and @markruys

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests