Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Upgrade @orama/orama from 2.0.0-beta.3 to 2.0.17 #125

Closed

Conversation

mateonunez
Copy link
Owner

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


![snyk-top-banner](https://github.com/andygongea/OWASP-Benchmark/assets/818805/c518c423-16fe-447e-b67f-ad5a49b5d123)

Snyk has created this PR to upgrade @orama/orama from 2.0.0-beta.3 to 2.0.17.

ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.


  • The recommended version is 27 versions ahead of your current version.

  • The recommended version was released on 23 days ago.

Release notes
Package name: @orama/orama from @orama/orama GitHub release notes

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open upgrade PRs.

For more information:

Snyk has created this PR to upgrade @orama/orama from 2.0.0-beta.3 to 2.0.17.

See this package in npm:
@orama/orama

See this project in Snyk:
https://app.snyk.io/org/mateonunez/project/caaf34ef-21a5-4029-b4a4-4bfc9ad6aa13?utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&page=upgrade-pr
@mateonunez mateonunez closed this Dec 3, 2024
@mateonunez mateonunez deleted the snyk-upgrade-a10795faccf67e2869fb927b857da4d0 branch December 3, 2024 10:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants