Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 26, 2024. It is now read-only.

Don't write bytecode #75

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 17, 2015
Merged

Don't write bytecode #75

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 17, 2015

Conversation

erikjohnston
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@NegativeMjark
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM

@ara4n
Copy link
Member

ara4n commented Feb 17, 2015

do we also need to clean up stale pycs?

On 17/02/2015 11:26, Mark Haines wrote:

LGTM


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#75 (comment).

@erikjohnston
Copy link
Member Author

I guess we could. I'm just cautious about deleting stuff from users file system though.

erikjohnston added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 17, 2015
@erikjohnston erikjohnston merged commit 20e3172 into hotfixes-v0.7.0g Feb 17, 2015
@erikjohnston erikjohnston deleted the dont_write_bytecode branch February 18, 2015 13:49
@ShadowJonathan ShadowJonathan mentioned this pull request Feb 26, 2021
4 tasks
anoadragon453 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 26, 2021
In #75, bytecode was disabled (from a bit of FUD back in `python<2.4` days, according to dev chat), I think it's safe enough to enable it again.

Added in `__pycache__/` and `.pyc`/`.pyd` to `.gitignore`, to extra-insure compiled files don't get committed.

`Signed-off-by: Jonathan de Jong <jonathan@automatia.nl>`
babolivier pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 1, 2021
Updating DINUM's synapse branch from v1.21.2 -> v1.24.0.

Shouldn't be any deprecations or config file changes to worry about.

This merge is paired with one for Sytest as well: matrix-org/sytest#999
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants