Account for port number in MQTT server #5084
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…additional format validation.
|
@jp-bennett @fifieldt FYI |
thebentern
approved these changes
Oct 16, 2024
|
Any ideas why the build suddenly failed? Is it transient? |
|
Possibly. Re-running. |
caveman99
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 3, 2024
…additional format validation. (#5084)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The port number might also be specified in the MQTT server address. If it is, we can’t let that fail validation of a private address.
Also adding some more format validation.
I still need to test this, but want to make this gap known early.✅ Tested.