Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Suggestion: Use URL over URI when connecting to an existing server #10190

Closed
Tyriar opened this issue May 31, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #12295
Closed

Suggestion: Use URL over URI when connecting to an existing server #10190

Tyriar opened this issue May 31, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #12295
Assignees
Labels
bug Issue identified by VS Code Team member as probable bug papercut 🩸 Something affecting the productivity of the team

Comments

@Tyriar
Copy link
Member

Tyriar commented May 31, 2022

Testing #10170

URL is more widely understood and I think more correct in this case?

Screen Shot 2022-05-31 at 10 09 48 am

@Tyriar Tyriar added the bug Issue identified by VS Code Team member as probable bug label May 31, 2022
@github-actions github-actions bot added the triage-needed Issue needs to be triaged label May 31, 2022
@greazer greazer added feature-request Request for new features or functionality papercut 🩸 Something affecting the productivity of the team notebook-remote Applies to remote Jupyter Servers and removed feature-request Request for new features or functionality triage-needed Issue needs to be triaged labels Jun 2, 2022
@rchiodo rchiodo removed their assignment Aug 4, 2022
@DonJayamanne DonJayamanne removed the notebook-remote Applies to remote Jupyter Servers label Aug 16, 2022
@IanMatthewHuff IanMatthewHuff removed their assignment Nov 10, 2022
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 19, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
bug Issue identified by VS Code Team member as probable bug papercut 🩸 Something affecting the productivity of the team
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

6 participants