Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Review architecture and design of Jupyter extension #8933

Closed
6 tasks
greazer opened this issue Feb 4, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #9918
Closed
6 tasks

Review architecture and design of Jupyter extension #8933

greazer opened this issue Feb 4, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #9918
Assignees
Labels
debt Code quality issues documentation
Milestone

Comments

@greazer
Copy link
Member

greazer commented Feb 4, 2022

  • Overall refactor of top-level folder structure [Refactor high level folders #8976]
  • Overview of architecture and components
  • Kernel enumeration, startup and execution
  • IntelliSense
  • Interactive Window and other core component interactions
  • Core components at the same time as well, e.g., how the builtin interactive window is put together.
@greazer greazer added this to the February 2022 milestone Feb 4, 2022
@greazer greazer changed the title Documentation and/or Deep Dive for areas of Jupyter extension Review architecture and design of Jupyter extension Feb 7, 2022
@greazer greazer modified the milestones: February 2022, March 2022 Feb 23, 2022
@greazer greazer added debt Code quality issues engineering labels Feb 23, 2022
@greazer greazer self-assigned this Mar 11, 2022
@rchiodo rchiodo modified the milestones: March 2022, April 2022 Mar 23, 2022
@rchiodo rchiodo modified the milestones: April 2022, May 2022 Apr 27, 2022
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators May 8, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
debt Code quality issues documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants