-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.4k
Virtual Workspaces
We have recently announced the Remote Repository feature in the VS Code Insiders Build. It lets you browse and edit files and folders directly on GitHub.
Open Remote Repository... opens VSCode on a folder or workspace located on a virtual file system. We call this a virtual workspace. When a virtual workspace is open in a VS Code window, this is shown by a label in the remote indicator in the lower left corner, similar to remote windows.
By nature, not all extensions will be able to fully work with virtual workspaces. Some extensions use tools that rely on resources being available on disk, need synchronous file access or don't have the necessary file system abstractions. When in a virtual workspace, VS Code will indicate to the user the restricted mode and that some extensions are deactivated or work with limited functionality.
Still, we want to make sure as many extensions as possible work in that setup and that we have a good user experience with the Remote Repository feature as well as other features leveraging virtual resources - from connecting to ftp-servers to working with cloud resource.
This guide shows how extensions can test against virtual workspaces, helps adopting and introduces the new virtualWorkspaces
capability property.
When a extension has no code but is a pure theme, keybinding, snippets, grammar extension, then it can run in a virtual workspace and no adoption is necessary.
Extension with code, that means extensions that define a main
entry point, require inspection and, possibly, adoption.
Run the Open Remote Repository... command from the Command Palette. Notice this command is currently only available in the VS Code Insiders version. The command shows a quick pick dialog and you can paste in any GitHub URL, or choose to search for a specific repository or pull request.
This opens a VSCode window for a virtual workspace where all resources are virtual.
The API support for virtual file system has already been around for quite a while. You can check out the file system provider API, if you are interested. A file system provider is registered for a new URI scheme (e.g. vscode-vfs
) and resources on that file system will be represented by URIs using that schema (e.g. vscode-vfs://github/microsoft/vscode/pacakge.json
)
Check how your extension deals with URIs it gets from the VSCode APIs:
- Never assume that the URI scheme is 'file'.
URI.fsPath
can only be used when the URI scheme is file. - Look out for usages of the
fs
node module for file system operations. If possible, use thevscode.workspace.fs
API, which delegates to the responsible file system provider. - Check for third party components that depend on a
fs
access (e.g. a language server or a node module) - If you run executables and tasks from commands, check whether these commands make sense in a virtual workspace window or whether they should be disabled.
There's a new capabilities
property in package.json
, and virtualWorkspaces
is used to signal whether an extension works with virtual workspace, or not.
The example below declares that an extension does not support virtual workspaces and should not be enabled by VS Code in this setup.
{
"capabilities": {
"virtualWorkspaces": false
}
}
With the latest insiders (1.57) it's now also possible to give a reason why the extension can not handle virtual workspaces:
{
"capabilities": {
"virtualWorkspaces": {
"supported": false,
"description": "Debugging is not possible in virtual workspaces."
}
}
}
When an extension works or partially works with virtual workspaces, then it should define "virtualWorkspaces": true
.
{
"capabilities": {
"virtualWorkspaces": true
}
}
With the latest insiders (1.57) it's now also possible to give a more information on what doesn't work:
{
"capabilities": {
"virtualWorkspaces": {
"supported": "limited",
"description": "In virtual workspaces, resolving and finding references across files is not supported."
}
}
}
The description is will be shown in the extensions view:
The extension should then disable the features that are not supported in a virtual workspace as described below.
"virtualWorkspaces": true
is the default for all extensions that have no yet filled in the virtualWorkspaces
capability.
However, when testing, we came up list of extensions that we think should be disabled in virtual workspaces.
The list can be found here. These extensions have "virtualWorkspaces": false
as default.
Of course, extension authors are in a better position to make this decision. The virtualWorkspaces
capability in the package.json
will override our default and we will eventually retire our list.
The availability of commands and views and many other contributions can be controlled through context keys in when
clauses.
The virtualWorkspace
context key is set when all workspace folders are located on virtual file systems. The example below shows the command npm.publish
in the command palette only when not in a virtual workspace:
{
"menus": {
"commandPalette": [
{
"command": "npm.publish",
"when": "!virtualWorkspace"
}
]
}
}
The resourceScheme
context key is set to the URI scheme of the currently selected element in the explorer or the element open in the editor.
In this example the npm.runSelectedScript
command is only in the editor context menu if the underlying resource is on the local disk.
{
"menus": {
"editor/context": [
{
"command": "npm.runSelectedScript",
"when": "resourceFilename == 'package.json' && resourceScheme == file"
}
]
}
}
To check in code whether the current workspace consists of non-file
schemes and is virtual you can use
const isVirtualWorkspace = workspace.workspaceFolders && workspace.workspaceFolders.every(f => f.uri.scheme !== 'file');
It's not realistic that all extensions are able to fully work with virtual resources. Many extensions built are on tools that require synchronous file access and files on disk. It's therefore ok to only provide limited functionality, such as the 'Basic' and the 'Single-File' support as listed below.
A. Basic Language Support:
- TextMate tokenization and colorization,
- language specific editing support: bracket pairs, comments, on enter rules, folding markers
- snippets
B. Single-File Language Support:
- document symbols (outline), folding, selection ranges
- document highlights, semantic highlighting, document colors
- completions, hovers, signature help, find references/declarations based on symbols on the current file and on static language libraries
- formatting, linked editing
- syntax validation and same-file semantic validation and code actions
C. Cross-file, Workspace Aware Language Support
- references across files
- workspace symbols
- validation of all files in the workspace/project
The rich language extensions that ship with VS Code (TypeScript, JSON, CSS, HTML, Markdown) are limited to Single-File Language Support when working on virtual resources.
We are working on a UI for VS Code to indicate that the Window runs in a restricted mode.
If working on a single file is not option, language extensions can also decide to disable the extension when in a virtual workspaces.
If your extension provides both grammars and rich language support and have to disable the extension also the grammars will be disabled. To avoid this, we recommend to split off a basic language extension (grammars, language configuration, snippets) form the rich language support and have two extensions.
- The basic language extension has
"virtualWorkspaces": true
and provides language id, configuration, grammar and snippets. - The rich language extension has
"virtualWorkspaces": false
contains the main file contributing language supports and commands and has a extension dependency (extensionDependencies
) on the basic language extension. The rich language extension should keep the ID of the established extension, so the user will continue to the full functionality by installing a single extension.
You can see this with the built-in language extensions, such as JSON, which consists of a JSON extension and a JSON language feature extension.
This separation has also helps with untrusted workspaces.
When registering a provider for a language feature (e.g. completions, hovers, code actions..) make sure to specify the schemes the provider supports:
return vscode.languages.registerCompletionItemProvider({ language: 'typescript', scheme: 'file' }, {
provideCompletionItems(document, position, token) {
// ...
}
});
Work is under way that will add FS support to LSP. Tracked in https://github.com/microsoft/language-server-protocol/issues/1264.
Please comment in the Virtual Workspaces Tracking Issue if you have questions and suggestions.
Project Management
- Roadmap
- Iteration Plans
- Development Process
- Issue Tracking
- Build Champion
- Release Process
- Running the Endgame
- Related Projects
Contributing
- How to Contribute
- Submitting Bugs and Suggestions
- Feedback Channels
- Source Code Organization
- Coding Guidelines
- Testing
- Dealing with Test Flakiness
- Contributor License Agreement
- Extension API Guidelines
- Accessibility Guidelines
Documentation