Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add a test for discriminant_value #1021

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 7, 2022

Conversation

adpaco-aws
Copy link
Contributor

Description of changes:

Adds a test for discriminant_value. The implementation works as expected for all covered cases, so this completes the audit for the intrinsic.

Resolved issues:

Part of #727

Call-outs:

Testing:

  • How is this change tested? Adds one test.

  • Is this a refactor change? No.

Checklist

  • Each commit message has a non-empty body, explaining why the change was made
  • Methods or procedures are documented
  • Regression or unit tests are included, or existing tests cover the modified code
  • My PR is restricted to a single feature or bugfix

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 and MIT licenses.

@adpaco-aws adpaco-aws requested a review from a team as a code owner April 7, 2022 19:23
Copy link
Contributor

@celinval celinval left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice coverage! Please address the comment below before pushing.

}

#[kani::proof]
fn main() {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you please split this into 3 different harnesses? I think it will make this much easier to read.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the suggestion, I didn't think about that! It's now split into 4 harnesses, can you take another look?

@adpaco-aws adpaco-aws requested a review from celinval April 7, 2022 21:39
Copy link
Contributor

@celinval celinval left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me. Maybe next time use /// to comment the harness instead of the function body. But that is just a test so no need to bother. Thanks!

@adpaco-aws adpaco-aws merged commit cb2e2f3 into model-checking:main Apr 7, 2022
@adpaco-aws adpaco-aws mentioned this pull request Apr 7, 2022
tedinski pushed a commit to tedinski/rmc that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2022
* Add a test for `discriminant_value`

* Split into 4 proofs
tedinski pushed a commit to tedinski/rmc that referenced this pull request Apr 25, 2022
* Add a test for `discriminant_value`

* Split into 4 proofs
tedinski pushed a commit to tedinski/rmc that referenced this pull request Apr 26, 2022
* Add a test for `discriminant_value`

* Split into 4 proofs
tedinski pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 27, 2022
* Add a test for `discriminant_value`

* Split into 4 proofs
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants