Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Text Annotator: Tweak user-facing language provide user feedback mechanism on recognized entities #866

Open
2 tasks
Tracked by #737
jmcmurry opened this issue Jan 4, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@jmcmurry
Copy link
Member

jmcmurry commented Jan 4, 2021

  • Short term fix: Once you get the annotated text, provide some text indication that the list of phenotypes can be tweaked afterward rather than just "analyze phenotypes"
  • Longer-term fix: Provide thumbs up thumbs down feedback for each recognized term in situ.

@jmcmurry
Copy link
Member Author

jmcmurry commented Jan 4, 2021

Here's how it should look when completed; this was done for Hippo publications browser which is no longer; however the basic user design applies and worked well at the time.

Right now, there is no way to tweak anything other than the list of recognized phenotypes. If you could use color codes for the kinds of entities recognized, that would help as well. Ideally, we should capture which recognized concepts the user validates as this can improve the algorithm, however, that is more of a long-range goal.

Any concepts which are recognized but not one of the above 5 types (or anatomy) should be ignored I think

@jmcmurry jmcmurry changed the title Tweak user-facing language on Text Annotator Text Annotator: Tweak user-facing language provide user feedback mechanism on recognized entities Jun 15, 2021
@jen-martin jen-martin removed their assignment Jun 29, 2021
@monicacecilia monicacecilia transferred this issue from monarch-initiative/monarch-ui Oct 31, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants