Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve association table search #268

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Dec 15, 2023

Conversation

kevinschaper
Copy link
Member

Initially, this PR is a little disapointing.

It expands the searched fields to include closure IDs and labels, as well as evidence fields...the thing is, those fields aren't tokenized, they're all keywords, which means my use case of finding the one skeletal phenotype associated with Glaucoma requires putting the exact HPO term name into the search box, and wrapping it in quotes. (🙄)

So, I'm getting this in place, and I'm going to add additional fields declarations and copy-field statements for association indexing in monarch-ingest.

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Aug 10, 2023

Deploy Preview for monarch-app ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 1f7a06c
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/monarch-app/deploys/655e7af8c9ada60009b365cc
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-268--monarch-app.netlify.app/
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@kevinschaper kevinschaper marked this pull request as draft August 31, 2023 20:53
@kevinschaper kevinschaper force-pushed the issue-264-association-table-search branch from 3a2bd5b to 29f0f01 Compare November 22, 2023 20:11
@kevinschaper kevinschaper marked this pull request as ready for review December 8, 2023 18:16
@kevinschaper kevinschaper merged commit 321125a into main Dec 15, 2023
10 checks passed
@kevinschaper kevinschaper deleted the issue-264-association-table-search branch December 15, 2023 23:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants