Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 20, 2023. It is now read-only.

For #5094: Adds telemetry for show search shortcuts #5886

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 11, 2019

Conversation

sblatz
Copy link
Contributor

@sblatz sblatz commented Oct 9, 2019

Pull Request checklist

  • Quality: This PR builds and passes detekt/ktlint checks (A pre-push hook is recommended)
  • Tests: This PR includes thorough tests or an explanation of why it does not
  • Screenshots: This PR includes screenshots or GIFs of the changes made or an explanation of why it does not
  • Accessibility: The code in this PR follows accessibility best practices or does not include any user facing features

After merge

  • Milestone: Make sure issues finished by this pull request are added to the milestone of the version currently in development.

To download an APK when reviewing a PR:

  1. click on Show All Checks,
  2. click Details next to "Taskcluster (pull_request)" after it appears and then finishes with a green checkmark,
  3. click on the "Fenix - assemble" task, then click "Run Artifacts".
  4. the APK links should be on the left side of the screen, named for each CPU architecture

@sblatz sblatz added the needs:data-review PR is awaiting a data review label Oct 9, 2019
@sblatz
Copy link
Contributor Author

sblatz commented Oct 9, 2019

Request for data collection review form

All questions are mandatory. You must receive review from a data steward peer on your responses to these questions before shipping new data collection.

  1. What questions will you answer with this data?
  • Do users want to see suggestions for search shortcuts (other search engines)
  1. Why does Mozilla need to answer these questions? Are there benefits for users? Do we need this information to address product or business requirements?
  • We want to know if users choose to disable various types of awesomebar suggestions so we can improve its usability in future iterations.
  1. What alternative methods did you consider to answer these questions? Why were they not sufficient?
  • N/A (These are baseline metrics)
  1. Can current instrumentation answer these questions?
  • Currently there are no events to track this preference, though we do track other suggestion toggles, so we'd like data on this one as well.
  1. List all proposed measurements and indicate the category of data collection for each measurement, using the Firefox data collection categories on the found on the Mozilla wiki.
  • All data is Category 2.
  1. How long will this data be collected?

Until 03/01/2020

  1. What populations will you measure?
  • All release, beta, and nightly users with telemetry enabled.
  1. Please provide a general description of how you will analyze this data.
  • Glean / Amplitude
  1. Where do you intend to share the results of your analysis?
  • Only on Glean, Amplitude and with mobile teams.

@sblatz
Copy link
Contributor Author

sblatz commented Oct 9, 2019

Related data review: #5704

@sblatz sblatz requested a review from boek October 9, 2019 16:41
@sblatz sblatz force-pushed the telem-for-sugg-toggle branch from e74bb75 to 929a232 Compare October 9, 2019 16:41
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Oct 9, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #5886 into master will decrease coverage by <.01%.
The diff coverage is 0%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #5886      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     14.35%   14.35%   -0.01%     
  Complexity      320      320              
============================================
  Files           257      257              
  Lines         10604    10605       +1     
  Branches       1551     1551              
============================================
  Hits           1522     1522              
- Misses         8956     8957       +1     
  Partials        126      126
Impacted Files Coverage Δ Complexity Δ
...va/org/mozilla/fenix/components/metrics/Metrics.kt 25.47% <0%> (-0.13%) 0 <0> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 6ec0d46...929a232. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Contributor

@liuche liuche left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One nit: You should also commit the generated changes to the metrics.md file.

Data Review Form (to be filled by Data Stewards)

Instructions: Data Stewards will review a request for data collection and endorse responses to each question. If the request does not provide answers to questions, reviewers give an r- and point to the questions that can’t be answered.

  1. Is there or will there be documentation that describes the schema for the ultimate data set in a public, complete, and accurate way?

Yes, updated metrics.yaml

  1. Is there a control mechanism that allows the user to turn the data collection on and off? (Note, for data collection not needed for security purposes, Mozilla provides such a control mechanism) Provide details as to the control mechanism available.

Yes, fenix data controls

  1. If the request is for permanent data collection, is there someone who will monitor the data over time?

Expiry 3/2020

  1. Using the category system of data types on the Mozilla wiki, what collection type of data do the requested measurements fall under?

Type 2

  1. Is the data collection request for default-on or default-off?

Default on

  1. Does the instrumentation include the addition of any new identifiers (whether anonymous or otherwise; e.g., username, random IDs, etc. See the appendix for more details)?

No, UI telemetry

  1. Is the data collection covered by the existing Firefox privacy notice?

Yes, usage data

  1. Does there need to be a check-in in the future to determine whether to renew the data? (Yes/No) (If yes, set a todo reminder or file a bug if appropriate)**

Has expiry

  1. Does the data collection use a third-party collection tool? If yes, escalate to legal.

No

@liuche liuche removed the request for review from boek October 11, 2019 00:27
@liuche
Copy link
Contributor

liuche commented Oct 11, 2019

r+ but needs to actually commit the generated documentation changes.

@boek boek merged commit 980b116 into mozilla-mobile:master Oct 11, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
needs:data-review PR is awaiting a data review
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants