Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update 1 NuGet dependencies #373

Merged

Conversation

nfbot
Copy link
Member

@nfbot nfbot commented Sep 13, 2024

Bumps nanoFramework.TestFramework from 2.1.107 to 2.1.111

[version update]

⚠️ This is an automated update. ⚠️

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated the testing framework dependency to a newer version, which may include enhancements and bug fixes.

Bumps nanoFramework.TestFramework from 2.1.107 to 2.1.111</br>
[version update]

### ⚠️ This is an automated update. ⚠️
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 13, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request updates the version of the nanoFramework.TestFramework package in the packages.lock.json file from 2.1.107 to 2.1.111. This change reflects a shift to a newer version of the testing framework, which may include various updates such as bug fixes or enhancements.

Changes

File Change Summary
Tests/MessageUnitTests/packages.lock.json Updated nanoFramework.TestFramework from version 2.1.107 to 2.1.111.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
N/A No linked issues provided for assessment.

Possibly related issues

  • None identified.

Possibly related PRs

  • Update 1 NuGet dependencies #367: This PR updates the nanoFramework.TestFramework from version 2.1.104 to 2.1.107, which is directly related to the main PR that updates the same package from 2.1.107 to 2.1.111.

Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8201a99 and c48d652.

Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • Tests/MessageUnitTests/MessageUnitTests.nfproj is excluded by none and included by none
  • Tests/MessageUnitTests/packages.config is excluded by none and included by none
Files selected for processing (1)
  • Tests/MessageUnitTests/packages.lock.json (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
Tests/MessageUnitTests/packages.lock.json (1)

19-21: LGTM!

Updating the nanoFramework.TestFramework package to version 2.1.111 in the lock file looks good. It's a minor version bump, which likely includes bug fixes or small improvements.

The changes are consistent with the PR summary and objectives.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@nfbot nfbot merged commit c5bb6a7 into main Sep 13, 2024
7 checks passed
@nfbot nfbot deleted the nfbot/update-dependencies/bbeb1d20-d272-44e2-841c-4f1edbab94e9 branch September 13, 2024 00:10
This was referenced Nov 20, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant