Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update 1 NuGet dependencies #381

Merged

Conversation

nfbot
Copy link
Member

@nfbot nfbot commented Nov 29, 2024

Bumps nanoFramework.TestFramework from 3.0.45 to 3.0.47

[version update]

⚠️ This is an automated update. ⚠️

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated the dependency version for nanoFramework.TestFramework to enhance testing capabilities.

Bumps nanoFramework.TestFramework from 3.0.45 to 3.0.47</br>
[version update]

### ⚠️ This is an automated update. ⚠️
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 29, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve an update to the packages.lock.json file, specifically changing the version of the nanoFramework.TestFramework dependency from 3.0.45 to 3.0.47. This update includes modifications to the resolved version and the content hash to align with the new dependency version.

Changes

File Change Summary
Tests/MessageUnitTests/packages.lock.json Updated nanoFramework.TestFramework version from 3.0.45 to 3.0.47, including resolved version and content hash changes.

Possibly related PRs


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 51e5df3 and 3124e1b.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • Tests/MessageUnitTests/MessageUnitTests.nfproj is excluded by none and included by none
  • Tests/MessageUnitTests/packages.config is excluded by none and included by none
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • Tests/MessageUnitTests/packages.lock.json (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
Tests/MessageUnitTests/packages.lock.json (1)

19-21: LGTM! Version update matches PR objectives.

The update of nanoFramework.TestFramework from 3.0.45 to 3.0.47 is consistent with the PR objectives. Both requested and resolved versions are properly aligned.

Let's verify the package integrity:

✅ Verification successful

Package update verified in project configuration

The package reference to nanoFramework.TestFramework version 3.0.47 is correctly reflected in the project's package configuration, and it's marked as a development dependency. While we couldn't verify the exact content hash from NuGet's registry, the version update is consistent across both the packages.lock.json and the project's package configuration files.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the package version and hash against NuGet registry
# Expected: The content hash should match the official package

# Fetch package metadata from NuGet
curl -s "https://api.nuget.org/v3/registration5-semver1/nanoframework.testframework/3.0.47.json" | jq -r '.catalogEntry | {version, packageHash}'

# Check for any reported issues in the version range
gh api graphql -f query='
{
  securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: NUGET, package: "nanoframework.testframework", range: ">=3.0.45 <=3.0.47") {
    nodes {
      advisory {
        summary
        severity
        publishedAt
      }
    }
  }
}'

Length of output: 835


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to verify the package metadata
# First, let's check if there are any package references to nanoFramework.TestFramework
rg -l "nanoFramework.TestFramework" --type xml

# Then let's look for any package configurations or project files
fd -e csproj -e props -e config . --exec cat {} \; 

Length of output: 5066


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@nfbot nfbot merged commit 703a9c5 into main Nov 29, 2024
7 checks passed
@nfbot nfbot deleted the nfbot/update-dependencies/b6c92593-fb6f-4292-a174-c60b0ff5709c branch November 29, 2024 00:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant