-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 33
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
custom-fields
and custom-field-choices
are supposed to be different endpoint
#114
Comments
nautics889
added a commit
to nautics889/pynautobot
that referenced
this issue
Apr 16, 2023
Add method `custom_field_choices()` in `App` class. Rename method `custom_choices()` to `custom_fields()`. Update docstings for both methods according to returning data.
nautics889
added a commit
to nautics889/pynautobot
that referenced
this issue
Apr 16, 2023
Add test case `AppCustomFieldChoicesTestCase` for `custom_field_choices()` method. Rename test case for `custom_fields()` method. Add using fixtures for mentioned test cases.
nautics889
added a commit
to nautics889/pynautobot
that referenced
this issue
Apr 16, 2023
Add missing JSON files with fixtures for tests for getting custom fields.
nautics889
added a commit
to nautics889/pynautobot
that referenced
this issue
Apr 16, 2023
Attempt to fix test cases `AppCustomFieldsTestCase` and `AppCustomFieldChoicesTestCase`.
nautics889
added a commit
to nautics889/pynautobot
that referenced
this issue
Apr 16, 2023
Attempt to fix test cases `AppCustomFieldsTestCase` and `AppCustomFieldChoicesTestCase`.
nautics889
added a commit
to nautics889/pynautobot
that referenced
this issue
Apr 16, 2023
Attempt to fix test cases `AppCustomFieldsTestCase` and `AppCustomFieldChoicesTestCase`.
nautics889
added a commit
to nautics889/pynautobot
that referenced
this issue
Apr 16, 2023
Fix test cases `AppCustomFieldsTestCase` and `AppCustomFieldChoicesTestCase` for python 3.7 stable. Update logic for checking passed arguments of mock's `call_args`.
nautics889
added a commit
to nautics889/pynautobot
that referenced
this issue
Jul 15, 2023
* (docs) update docstrings for `custom_fields()` and `custom_field_choices()` methods * (refactor): use f-strings instead of `.format()` in `custom_fields()` and `custom_field_choices()` * (tests): update naming in tests * (tests): use `return_value` instead of `side_effect` for mocks
nautics889
added a commit
to nautics889/pynautobot
that referenced
this issue
Jul 25, 2023
* (refactor): call `custom_fields()` in `custom_choices()` since they represent essentially identical requests to Nautobot
Merged
pszulczewski
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 24, 2023
* fix: Update methods for custom fields (#114) Add method `custom_field_choices()` in `App` class. Rename method `custom_choices()` to `custom_fields()`. Update docstings for both methods according to returning data. * fix: Tests for methods for custom fields (#114) Add test case `AppCustomFieldChoicesTestCase` for `custom_field_choices()` method. Rename test case for `custom_fields()` method. Add using fixtures for mentioned test cases. * fix: Fixtures for tests (custom fields) (#114) Add missing JSON files with fixtures for tests for getting custom fields. * fix: Failing test for getting custom fields (#114) Fix test cases `AppCustomFieldsTestCase` and `AppCustomFieldChoicesTestCase` for python 3.7 stable. Update logic for checking passed arguments of mock's `call_args`. * Update api.py * max_workers added * max_workers added * Update query.py * Update query.py * max_workers from api to request * debug removed * Update api.py * Update query.py * refactor: Update docstrings and naming (#114) * (docs) update docstrings for `custom_fields()` and `custom_field_choices()` methods * (refactor): use f-strings instead of `.format()` in `custom_fields()` and `custom_field_choices()` * (tests): update naming in tests * (tests): use `return_value` instead of `side_effect` for mocks * fix: backward compatibility * (fix): restore original method `custom_choices()` for application class to provide a compatibility with existing client code * (enhance): add logging a deprecation warning * refactor: update `custom_choices()` (#114) * (refactor): call `custom_fields()` in `custom_choices()` since they represent essentially identical requests to Nautobot * Add version constraint to divide into two release trains 1.x and 2.x (#130) Add version constraint to divide into two release trains 1.x and 2.x * Release 2.0 (#136) * Release 2.0.0 --------- Co-authored-by: Jan Snasel <jan.snasel@networktocode.com> Co-authored-by: Joe Wesch <10467633+joewesch@users.noreply.github.com> * Fix SSL verify (#140) (#142) * Fix custom_fields and custom_field_choices method overlap with endpoints (#141) (#144) * Release 2.0.1 --------- Co-authored-by: nautics889 <cyberukr@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: NobodyIsPerfect78 <46317624+NobodyIsPerfect78@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Josh VanDeraa <jv@networktocode.com> Co-authored-by: Joe Wesch <10467633+joewesch@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Jan Snasel <jan.snasel@networktocode.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
In
App
class of pynautobot library there is method for retrieving data from '/api/extras/custom-fields/' endpoint. The method has namecustom_choices()
.And it can make some mess, because Nautobot service actually provide another endpoint "/api/extras/custom-field-choices/". So such naming can be somewhat confusing:
from /api/extras:
And they return completely different data.
Futhermore, there is no method to get data from "/api/extras/custom-field-choices/". Perhaps it should be implemented.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: