-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove BlockBase and ConsensusData #2296
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Shargon <shargon@gmail.com>
public UInt256 MerkleRoot => Header.MerkleRoot; | ||
public ulong Timestamp => Header.Timestamp; | ||
public uint Index => Header.Index; | ||
public byte PrimaryIndex => Header.PrimaryIndex; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This simplifies things a lot, but don't we also want to have a nonce in the header? It might be useful to have for contracts.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The nonce in the block is an unreliable random number, and contracts should not rely on it.
sizeof(uint) + // Index | ||
sizeof(byte) + // PrimaryIndex | ||
UInt160.Length + // NextConsensus | ||
1 + Witness.Size; // Witness |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We can even keep the same header size by removing this 1
.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We have already discussed this before. 😆
* sync neo-project/neo#2296 * upgrade neo
* neo-project/neo#2295 * neo-project/neo#2290 * neo-project/neo#2292 * neo-project/neo#2296 * neo-project/neo#2301 * neo-project/neo#2298 * neo-project/neo#2312 * neo-project/neo#2300 * neo-project/neo#2333 * neo-project/neo#2337 * neo-project/neo#2331 * neo-project/neo#2332 * neo-project/neo#2343 * neo-project/neo#2339 * neo-project/neo#2350 * neo-project/neo#2351 * neo-project/neo#2353 * neo-project/neo#2356 * neo-project/neo#2375 * neo-project/neo#2377 * neo-project/neo#2379 * https://github.com/neo-project/neo/pull/2392/files * neo-project/neo#2400 * audit updates * refactor and bump VM requirement
This is a bad one. $ ./bin/neo-go contract testinvokefunction -r https://rpc10.n3.nspcc.ru:10331 0xda65b600f7124ce6c79950c1772a36403104f2be getBlock 5762000 { "state": "HALT", "gasconsumed": "202812", "script": "AtDrVwARwB8MCGdldEJsb2NrDBS+8gQxQDYqd8FQmcfmTBL3ALZl2kFifVtS", "stack": [ { "type": "Array", "value": [ { "type": "ByteString", "value": "vq5IPTPEDRhz0JA4cQKIa6/o97pnJt/HfVkDRknd1rg=" }, { "type": "Integer", "value": "0" }, { "type": "ByteString", "value": "zFYF3LGaTKdbqVX99shaBUzTq9YjXb0jaPMjk2jdSP4=" }, { "type": "ByteString", "value": "AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA=" }, { "type": "Integer", "value": "1722060076994" }, { "type": "Integer", "value": "5293295626238767595" }, { "type": "Integer", "value": "5762000" }, { "type": "ByteString", "value": "LIt05Fpxhl/kXMX3EAGIASyOSQs=" }, { "type": "Integer", "value": "0" } ] } ], "exception": null, "notifications": [] } $ ./bin/neo-go contract testinvokefunction -r http://seed3.neo.org:10332 0xda65b600f7124ce6c79950c1772a36403104f2be getBlock 5762000 { "state": "HALT", "gasconsumed": "202812", "script": "AtDrVwARwB8MCGdldEJsb2NrDBS+8gQxQDYqd8FQmcfmTBL3ALZl2kFifVtS", "stack": [ { "type": "Array", "value": [ { "type": "ByteString", "value": "vq5IPTPEDRhz0JA4cQKIa6/o97pnJt/HfVkDRknd1rg=" }, { "type": "Integer", "value": "0" }, { "type": "ByteString", "value": "zFYF3LGaTKdbqVX99shaBUzTq9YjXb0jaPMjk2jdSP4=" }, { "type": "ByteString", "value": "AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA=" }, { "type": "Integer", "value": "1722060076994" }, { "type": "Integer", "value": "5293295626238767595" }, { "type": "Integer", "value": "5762000" }, { "type": "Integer", "value": "6" }, { "type": "ByteString", "value": "LIt05Fpxhl/kXMX3EAGIASyOSQs=" }, { "type": "Integer", "value": "0" } ] } ], "exception": null, "notifications": [] } 9 fields vs 10, notice the primary index right after the block number. Back when ac52765 initially added Ledger I've used neo-project/neo#2215 as a reference and it was correct (no primary index). But then neo-project/neo#2296 came into the C# codebase and while it looked like a pure refactoring it actually did add the primary index as well and this wasn't noticed. It wasn't noticed even when 3a4e0ca had touched some nearby code. In short, we had a completely wrong implementation of this call for more than three years. But looks like it's not a very popular one. Signed-off-by: Roman Khimov <roman@nspcc.ru>
No description provided.