-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 128
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
filter: Split filtering and subsampling #1432
Draft
victorlin
wants to merge
5
commits into
master
Choose a base branch
from
victorlin/split-filtering-and-subsampling
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Draft
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
cf0b808
Cleanup outputs using top-level exception handling
victorlin 7bb4650
Properly set index dtype as string
victorlin 8d7206c
Use category dtype
victorlin 52fbad6
🚧 Run through metadata in one chunk
victorlin 850d908
🚧 Deprecate augur filter --metadata-chunk-size
victorlin File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Large diffs are not rendered by default.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
52fbad6 passes all Cram tests but fails on the ncov trial run:
This means that given its current and growing size, the SARS-CoV-2 dataset is impractical to load into memory all at once despite optimizations such as loading a subset of columns and 8d7206c. The only solution for more modular and portable functions in the codebase is an on-disk approach, which Pandas does not support. There is a spectrum of alternatives, which I think can be divided into two categories:
augur filter
, requiring extensive testing. The other downside is this will require some form of Pandas roundtripping to continue supporting the widely-used Pandas-based queries in--query
.I think it's reasonable to explore (1) on top of current changes in this PR to see if it's a viable option. Even if the end goal is (2), (1) would provide a good stepping stone in the direction of the database approach.