-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 717
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Explicitly set "--skip_bbsplit false" with "--bbsplit_fasta_list" to use BBSplit #762
Comments
Hi @G-Sarah ! Hope you are well! All I will add a note to the docs where I can and get back to you. |
Closing for now but please feel free to re-open if I have missed something here :) |
Ok I did not think of it that way. I think it would benefit from being explicit in the doc, yes. I guess it'll be a point to address in the upcoming doc hackathon. ^^ |
Hello, I'm trying to clarify some points in the docs for the nf-core hackathon, and notably this --skip-bbsplit thingie, but the |
Hi @G-Sarah ! The parameter docs are embedded and rendered directly from the parameter schema e.g. here. You can edit these by using the Let me know if you need anything else. Thanks! |
Thank you! |
Fixed in #815 |
Description of feature
Hello, first, thanks for the fantastic pipeline!
Pretty much all's in the title. The default value of --skip_bbsplit is 1 whether or not a fasta list is passed or not. The pipeline clearly lists the --bbsplit_fasta_list (and --save_bbsplit_reads) parameters in the non-default ones but still skips the step since --skip_bbsplit doesn't switch to 0.
It might sound silly but I lost quite a bit of time by assuming this was the default behavior. Maybe it should be?
Have a nice day!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: