-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 717
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Save transcriptome BAM files when using --save_umi_intermeds / --save_align_intermeds #931
Comments
Fixed in 07ddd71 Hi @pcantalupo ! This was intentional behaviour as I didn't see the point in publishing "too" many BAM files, especially since this is configurable now via a custom config. However, I have changed the default behaviour now to publish everything just in case these files are actually useful to debug stuff. I think I got all of them so please have a check after the next release and lemme know if I missed anything. (when using
|
I checked release 3.11.1 and it looks good. Thank you |
Great! Thanks for confirming! |
Description of the bug
I’m using v3.9 with
--save_umi_intermeds
and--save_align_intermeds
to save all BAM files. After pipeline finishes, I find these BAM files inresults
However, SALMON_QUANT uses the BAM file
22-0283.umi_dedup.transcriptome.filtered.bam
(see below). Shouldn’t it be copied toresults/
when using those intermeds parameters?Additionally, I found 4 bam files in
work/
that are not copied toresults
. Is this a design choice even when using the intermeds parameters?Thank you
Command used and terminal output
Relevant files
No response
System information
pipeline version: 3.9
nextflow 22.04.3
singularity 3.9.6
slurm on HPC
Linux
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: