Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[superseded] deprecate accumulateResult and mention sequtils.toSeq #8182

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

timotheecour
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

lib/system.nim Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@dom96
Copy link
Contributor

dom96 commented Jul 3, 2018

When deprecating you need to update the doc comment:

## ...
##
## **Deprecated since v0.19.0:** use toSeq instead

Please be sure to add an empty ## line so that this is formatted well in the doc gen.

@timotheecour
Copy link
Member Author

@dom96 PTAL

@timotheecour timotheecour changed the title accumulateResult: mention sequtils.toSeq deprecate accumulateResult and mention sequtils.toSeq Jul 3, 2018
@skilchen
Copy link
Contributor

skilchen commented Jul 3, 2018

But beware: the current implementation of toSeq is problematic (see #7187) and needs to be fixed before this deprecation makes sense.

@timotheecour
Copy link
Member Author

@skilchen ok, closing until that's done

@timotheecour timotheecour changed the title deprecate accumulateResult and mention sequtils.toSeq [TODO] deprecate accumulateResult and mention sequtils.toSeq Aug 9, 2018
@timotheecour timotheecour changed the title [TODO] deprecate accumulateResult and mention sequtils.toSeq deprecate accumulateResult and mention sequtils.toSeq Aug 16, 2018
@timotheecour timotheecour changed the title deprecate accumulateResult and mention sequtils.toSeq [superseded] deprecate accumulateResult and mention sequtils.toSeq Aug 29, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants