-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 683
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Move SigSet, TimeVal to libc, add TimeSpec and pselect syscall. #276
Conversation
I guess we should use proper |
When you do, could you also rebase on top of master now that #272 was merged? |
(Or drop the duplicate commits) |
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #285) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
Just to give a signal -- I remember about those and I'll continue working at them when I get more time. Sorry for the delay! |
@abbradar no worries! And thanks again for your contributions and interest! :-) |
Argh, I've just now rebased it atop master and now I cannot find old comments which you've done.... @kamalmarhubi , can you please review this once more time! Or, even better, is there any way to actually get those old comments when you've force-pushed? |
I checked my emails. There were no other comments of @kamalmarhubi on this PR. |
I was talking about his old comments. Said that, I was able to find them in the mailbox archive -- sorry for the noise! I'll go through them shortly. |
I've moved |
assert_eq!(TimeVal::minutes(3) + TimeVal::seconds(2), | ||
TimeVal::seconds(182)); | ||
assert!(TimeVal::seconds(1) + TimeVal::seconds(2) == TimeVal::seconds(3)); | ||
assert!(TimeVal::minutes(3) + TimeVal::seconds(2) == TimeVal::seconds(182)); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
assert_eq
is preferable because it prints the left and right hand sides
let fd = fd as usize; | ||
self.bits[fd / BITS] & (1 << (fd % BITS)) > 0 | ||
pub fn contains(&self, fd: RawFd) -> bool { | ||
assert!(fd >= 0 && fd < FD_SETSIZE, "RawFd out of bounds"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we can probably just return false in this case, while preserving expected meaning?
I made some comments. I do think though that it would be easier to review further changes if each commit was its own PR. |
(And thanks for patience, and for coming back to this PR!) |
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #405) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
@abbradar I think most of these changes have already been done or are not decided on, but the addition of |
I can rebase of course but I don't have much left over from my old project from that time so I cannot test it responsibly now. |
@abbradar That's fair and I'm going to close this then. Thanks anyways for submitting this PR, sorry it languished so long. |
This is a straight port of @abbradar's work in nix-rust#276, with two (somewhat weak) tests and a bit of documentation.
This is a straight port of @abbradar's work in nix-rust#276, with two (somewhat weak) tests and a bit of documentation.
This is a straight port of @abbradar's work in nix-rust#276, with two (somewhat weak) tests and a bit of documentation.
894: Add pselect syscall r=asomers a=antifuchs I saw that #276 was closed, and now I need `pselect`, so here it is! I copied the function body from @abbradar's work, updated the type signatures, added two tests and added a doc comment. Hope this works! Co-authored-by: Andreas Fuchs <asf@boinkor.net>
Part and extension of #270 and should be merged after #272. Maybe we want to split this across multiple PRs too (although this time these things are dependent on each other).