Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

(v7.x backport) child_process: fix deoptimizing use of arguments #11748

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

(v7.x backport) child_process: fix deoptimizing use of arguments #11748

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

vsemozhetbyt
Copy link
Contributor

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • tests and/or benchmarks are included
  • commit message follows commit guidelines
Affected core subsystem(s)

child_process, benchmark

Backport of #11535

Removed or fixed use of arguments in execFile(),
normalizeExecArgs(), and normalizeSpawnArguments().

Refs: #10323
Refs: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/v8/issues/detail?id=6010
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added child_process Issues and PRs related to the child_process subsystem. v7.x labels Mar 8, 2017
@vsemozhetbyt vsemozhetbyt changed the title child_process: fix deoptimizing use of arguments (v7.x backport) child_process: fix deoptimizing use of arguments Mar 8, 2017
@vsemozhetbyt
Copy link
Contributor Author

vsemozhetbyt commented Mar 8, 2017

This is my first backport using the proposed guide. Please, correct me if I've done something wrong.

#8312 was the cause of the conflict, so I've just removed the bit from it.

@jasnell
Copy link
Member

jasnell commented Mar 8, 2017

jasnell pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 16, 2017
Removed or fixed use of arguments in execFile(),
normalizeExecArgs(), and normalizeSpawnArguments().

Refs: #10323
Refs: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/v8/issues/detail?id=6010

Backport-Of: #11535
PR-URL: #11748
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
@jasnell
Copy link
Member

jasnell commented Mar 16, 2017

Landed in 5b1d61c

@jasnell jasnell closed this Mar 16, 2017
@vsemozhetbyt vsemozhetbyt deleted the backport-11535-to-v7.x branch March 16, 2017 23:21
@MylesBorins
Copy link
Contributor

do we want to backport to v6.x?

@MylesBorins
Copy link
Contributor

ping

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
child_process Issues and PRs related to the child_process subsystem.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants