-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
async_hooks: use parent promise as triggerId in init hook #13367
Changes from 2 commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@ | ||
'use strict'; | ||
|
||
const common = require('../common'); | ||
const assert = require('assert'); | ||
const initHooks = require('./init-hooks'); | ||
const { checkInvocations } = require('./hook-checks'); | ||
|
||
const p = (new Promise(common.mustCall(executor))); | ||
p.then(afterresolution); | ||
|
||
// init hooks after chained promise is created | ||
const hooks = initHooks(); | ||
hooks._allowNoInit = true; | ||
hooks.enable(); | ||
|
||
function executor(resolve, reject) { | ||
resolve(5); | ||
} | ||
|
||
function afterresolution(val) { | ||
assert.strictEqual(val, 5); | ||
return val; | ||
} | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I think this would be a bit more readable if you just inlined There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. yes, you are right, I will change it. |
||
|
||
process.on('exit', onexit); | ||
function onexit() { | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. same for There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. yes, I will change it. |
||
hooks.disable(); | ||
hooks.sanityCheck('PROMISE'); | ||
|
||
const as = hooks.activitiesOfTypes('PROMISE'); | ||
const unknown = hooks.activitiesOfTypes('Unknown'); | ||
assert.strictEqual(as.length, 0, 'no activities with PROMISE type'); | ||
assert.strictEqual(unknown.length, 1, | ||
'one activity with Unknown type which in fact is PROMISE'); | ||
|
||
const a0 = unknown[0]; | ||
assert.strictEqual(a0.type, 'Unknown', | ||
'unknown request which in fact is PROMISE'); | ||
assert.strictEqual(typeof a0.uid, 'number', 'uid is a number'); | ||
checkInvocations(a0, { before: 1, after: 1 }, 'when process exits'); | ||
} |
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ p.then(afterresolution); | |
|
||
function executor(resolve, reject) { | ||
const as = hooks.activitiesOfTypes('PROMISE'); | ||
assert.strictEqual(as.length, 1, 'one activities'); | ||
assert.strictEqual(as.length, 1, 'one activity'); | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. If you want to avoid merge conflicts with #13243, you can just drop this change There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. @addaleax , ok , so I just revert it. |
||
const a = as[0]; | ||
checkInvocations(a, { init: 1 }, 'while in promise executor'); | ||
resolve(5); | ||
|
@@ -46,7 +46,8 @@ function onexit() { | |
const a1 = as[1]; | ||
assert.strictEqual(a1.type, 'PROMISE', 'promise request'); | ||
assert.strictEqual(typeof a1.uid, 'number', 'uid is a number'); | ||
assert.strictEqual(a1.triggerId, 1, 'parent uid 1'); | ||
assert.strictEqual(a1.triggerId, a0.uid, | ||
'child promise should use parent uid as triggerId'); | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Yeah, I would just not use an error message here (i.e. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. ok, so I just modify it to assert.strictEqual(a1.triggerId, a0.uid); |
||
// We expect a destroy hook as well but we cannot guarentee predictable gc. | ||
checkInvocations(a1, { init: 1, before: 1, after: 1 }, 'when process exits'); | ||
} |
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@ | ||
'use strict'; | ||
|
||
const common = require('../common'); | ||
const assert = require('assert'); | ||
const initHooks = require('./init-hooks'); | ||
const { checkInvocations } = require('./hook-checks'); | ||
|
||
const p = (new Promise(common.mustCall(executor))); | ||
|
||
// init hooks after promise was created | ||
const hooks = initHooks(); | ||
hooks._allowNoInit = true; | ||
hooks.enable(); | ||
|
||
p.then(afterresolution); | ||
|
||
function executor(resolve, reject) { | ||
resolve(5); | ||
} | ||
|
||
function afterresolution(val) { | ||
assert.strictEqual(val, 5); | ||
const as = hooks.activitiesOfTypes('PROMISE'); | ||
assert.strictEqual(as.length, 1, 'one activity'); | ||
checkInvocations(as[0], { init: 1, before: 1 }, | ||
'after resolution child promise'); | ||
return val; | ||
} | ||
|
||
process.on('exit', onexit); | ||
function onexit() { | ||
hooks.disable(); | ||
hooks.sanityCheck('PROMISE'); | ||
|
||
const as = hooks.activitiesOfTypes('PROMISE'); | ||
assert.strictEqual(as.length, 1, | ||
'should only get one activity(child promise)'); | ||
|
||
const a0 = as[0]; | ||
assert.strictEqual(a0.type, 'PROMISE', 'promise request'); | ||
assert.strictEqual(typeof a0.uid, 'number', 'uid is a number'); | ||
// we can't get the triggerId dynamically, we have to use static number here | ||
assert.strictEqual(a0.triggerId - (a0.uid - 3), 2, | ||
'child promise should use parent uid as triggerId'); | ||
// We expect a destroy hook as well but we cannot guarentee predictable gc. | ||
checkInvocations(a0, { init: 1, before: 1, after: 1 }, 'when process exits'); | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You don’t need the outer parentheses here
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes, I will remove it.