-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
n-api: fix object test #19039
n-api: fix object test #19039
Conversation
@@ -199,7 +198,7 @@ napi_value Wrap(napi_env env, napi_callback_info info) { | |||
napi_value arg; | |||
NAPI_CALL(env, napi_get_cb_info(env, info, &argc, &arg, NULL, NULL)); | |||
|
|||
int32_t* data = malloc(sizeof(int32_t)); | |||
int32_t* data = &test_value; | |||
*data = test_value; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Isn't this line redundant now?
Yeah, I'll get rid of it altogether.
…On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 2:08 PM, Colin Ihrig ***@***.***> wrote:
***@***.**** approved this pull request.
------------------------------
In test/addons-napi/test_object/test_object.c
<#19039 (comment)>:
> @@ -199,7 +198,7 @@ napi_value Wrap(napi_env env, napi_callback_info info) {
napi_value arg;
NAPI_CALL(env, napi_get_cb_info(env, info, &argc, &arg, NULL, NULL));
- int32_t* data = malloc(sizeof(int32_t));
+ int32_t* data = &test_value;
*data = test_value;
Isn't this line redundant now?
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#19039 (review)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA7k0QsMmy7jfk7aXglqHPca_MLXyjpNks5tZFKcgaJpZM4SVZVn>
.
|
Passing a pointer to a static integer is sufficient for the test.
6bba350
to
b0f7927
Compare
CI https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/13425/ @gabrielschulhof please always start a CI after opening a PR :-) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Landed in c698017. |
Passing a pointer to a static integer is sufficient for the test. PR-URL: #19039 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: Hitesh Kanwathirtha <hiteshk@microsoft.com>
Passing a pointer to a static integer is sufficient for the test. PR-URL: nodejs#19039 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: Hitesh Kanwathirtha <hiteshk@microsoft.com>
Passing a pointer to a static integer is sufficient for the test. PR-URL: nodejs#19039 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: Hitesh Kanwathirtha <hiteshk@microsoft.com>
Passing a pointer to a static integer is sufficient for the test. PR-URL: nodejs#19039 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: Hitesh Kanwathirtha <hiteshk@microsoft.com>
Passing a pointer to a static integer is sufficient for the test. PR-URL: nodejs#19039 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: Hitesh Kanwathirtha <hiteshk@microsoft.com>
Passing a pointer to a static integer is sufficient for the test.
Checklist
make -j4 test
(UNIX), orvcbuild test
(Windows) passesAffected core subsystem(s)
n-api