http2: fix flaky test-http2-https-fallback #19093
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The test was flaky because it relied on a specific order of asynchronous operation that were fired paralellely. This was true on most platform and conditions, but not all the time. See: nodejs#18986
mcollina
added
fast-track
3 tasks
jasnell
approved these changes
Mar 2, 2018
BridgeAR
approved these changes
Mar 2, 2018
|
Seems like Windows had some build issues. New CI https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/13461/ |
2 tasks
|
Looks like Windows is still failing completely? /cc @nodejs/build |
3 tasks
|
Windows has been fixed in #19103 , the last CI there suggested this one was the only error. New CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/13467/ |
|
Windows is failing for something else: This can land. |
|
Landed in 153ee7f |
mcollina
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 3, 2018
The test was flaky because it relied on a specific order of asynchronous operation that were fired paralellely. This was true on most platform and conditions, but not all the time. See: #18986 PR-URL: #19093 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
|
@joyeecheung Good spot! |
addaleax
pushed a commit
to addaleax/node
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 5, 2018
The test was flaky because it relied on a specific order of asynchronous operation that were fired paralellely. This was true on most platform and conditions, but not all the time. See: nodejs#18986 PR-URL: nodejs#19093 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Merged
kjin
pushed a commit
to kjin/node
that referenced
this pull request
May 1, 2018
The test was flaky because it relied on a specific order of asynchronous operation that were fired paralellely. This was true on most platform and conditions, but not all the time. See: nodejs#18986 PR-URL: nodejs#19093 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 2, 2018
The test was flaky because it relied on a specific order of asynchronous operation that were fired paralellely. This was true on most platform and conditions, but not all the time. See: #18986 Backport-PR-URL: #20456 PR-URL: #19093 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Merged
MayaLekova
pushed a commit
to MayaLekova/node
that referenced
this pull request
May 8, 2018
The test was flaky because it relied on a specific order of asynchronous operation that were fired paralellely. This was true on most platform and conditions, but not all the time. See: nodejs#18986 PR-URL: nodejs#19093 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 15, 2018
The test was flaky because it relied on a specific order of asynchronous operation that were fired paralellely. This was true on most platform and conditions, but not all the time. See: #18986 Backport-PR-URL: #20456 PR-URL: #19093 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 15, 2018
The test was flaky because it relied on a specific order of asynchronous operation that were fired paralellely. This was true on most platform and conditions, but not all the time. See: #18986 Backport-PR-URL: #20456 PR-URL: #19093 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The test was flaky because it relied on a specific order of
asynchronous operation that were fired paralellely. This was true
on most platform and conditions, but not all the time.
This test was introduced in #18986.
Checklist
make -j4 test(UNIX), orvcbuild test(Windows) passesAffected core subsystem(s)
http2, test