doc: add CTC meeting minutes 2016-01-27 #5057
Conversation
rvagg
commented
Feb 3, 2016
rvagg
commented
- Audio Recording: https://soundcloud.com/node-foundation/ctc-meeting-2016-01-27
- GitHub Issue: Node.js Foundation Core Technical Committee (CTC) Meeting 2016-01-27 #4901
- Minutes Google Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/145ND-9pGdAwZ1eoOMypX1_wtx5FCVoanWtLl8zzyxH8
- Previous Minutes Google Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1X3RbJhhLvFNojmQwxmsfUb2qPMyNPcVzcSS2aAoAon0
| * Ali Sheikh (observer) x | ||
| * Evan Lucas (observer) | ||
| * Rich Trott (observer) | ||
| * Michael Dawson (observer) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Do those xes signify something?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I wasn't in this meeting but I'm taking it to mean not-present and we continued this convention in the last meeting as well. Seems like that's not clear so do you have a better suggestion that's simple for note-takers? Deleting names has proven to be annoying for various reasons, although I guess I could remove them when I PR the minutes.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Maybe replace the x-es with (absent)?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hmmm under the heading "Present" , we are mentioning "absent"?
|
LGTM besides question. |
rvagg
force-pushed
the
ctc-minutes-2016-01-27
branch
from
a152b0b to
3967cb5
Compare
|
|
||
| Mikeal: hasn’t changed recently | ||
|
|
||
| Ben, James: read though it recently, lgtm |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I assume it's the actual chat transcript. If so we don't have to fix these typos
There was a problem hiding this comment.
More likely it was them expressing roughly the same thing and it was summarised in a single line for the sake of speed, it's pretty hard capturing discussion in real-time, we're not very skilled at taking it slowly!
So this is probably a typo, you're welcome to use your amazing fourth eye to point out typos and I'll happily fix them.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
:-) :-) Sure, I can point them out whenever I find :-) But then we can leave the chat transcripts as they are right? It would give the readers a feel that they are really dealing with humans, who can make mistakes just like them :D
|
LGTM |
2 similar comments
|
LGTM |
|
LGTM |
PR-URL: #5057 Reviewed-By: Roman Reiss <me@silverwind.io> Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl> Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
|
Landed in ce11a37 |
PR-URL: #5057 Reviewed-By: Roman Reiss <me@silverwind.io> Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl> Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
PR-URL: nodejs#5057 Reviewed-By: Roman Reiss <me@silverwind.io> Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl> Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
