Update readme with new process #37
Conversation
|
ping @nodejs/community-committee |
Co-Authored-By: Manil Chowdhury <manil.chowdhury@gmail.com>
|
Ping @nodejs/community-committee @amiller-gh @bnb |
|
ping @nodejs/community-committee, please review |
|
FWIW I would like to review once the above changes are made. Currently just pending those changes. |
|
@nodejs/community-committee
and removed the specific details about the submission process. There is still info available about the basic process and I think that is enough. We don't need to overdo it. |
| - You'll be added to [editors list on Medium](https://medium.com/the-node-js-collection/about). | ||
| - You'll receive discount to attend OpenJS Foundation Conference. | ||
|
|
||
| - Possibility to become a member of Node.js Project and avail benefits like [Travel Fund](https://github.com/nodejs/admin#travel-fund). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is a benefit of being a member of the project.
If being an editor includes being a member of the project, this is inherently true and phrasing it like this is slightly misleading since it's something that comes inherently anyway rather than a specific benefit of this work.
If being an editor does not include being a member of the project, then this is also slightly misleading since there is additional work above and beyond being an editor that this requires.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Being an editor will not include being project member. I think we should keep it nomination based. Like here.
Once we see, someone is actively reviewing posts for 2,3 months, we can nominate them to become part of Node.js Collection ( -> Community Committee -> Node.js Project).
I also don't want to overdo it in the start. Let's go with an easy and simple process, once we have enough editors, we can even put this on hold.
Point to mention Travel Fund here was that people know what benefits would they get in return. People who are not part of the project already, may not even know that there is a travel fund benefit.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Point to mention Travel Fund here was that people know what benefits would they get in return.
This is a good thing to include for the relevant groups. I do think it's important though to include it in the correct place, and, as you said, this is not something that people will get but something they could get if they stick around.
Once we see, someone is actively reviewing posts for 2,3 months, we can nominate them to become part of Node.js Collection ( -> Community Committee -> Node.js Project).
Is this documented anywhere? If so, I think that is the most appropriate place to include that context since it's the context in which it is accurate.
|
@nodejs/community-committee It seems I would not be able to find time for this any soon. I'd be happy to help if someone else takes this from here. |
|
Closing in favor of #41 |
ping: @nodejs/community-committee
@RRomoff can you please go through the "Review Process for Original Posts" and "Review Process for Created Medium Posts" sections?
I think we can add more details and make it easier to understand but couldn't find time to do that.
We also need to to add a link for Trello.
closes nodejs/community-committee#439 nodejs/community-committee#491