New version of spiffs #2172
Merged
New version of spiffs #2172
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
crasu
pushed a commit
to crasu/nodemcu-firmware
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 11, 2018
dnc40085
pushed a commit
to dnc40085/nodemcu-firmware
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 3, 2018
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #2046 .
devbranch rather than formaster.This is just running the spiffs upgrade script (and adding the missing defines in the config block). I did add 512 bytes to the read cache in an attempt to improve the performance.
The good news is that you can now write files larger than around 25k reliably. I have a 6.5MB file (this is on a 16MB flash chip). Opening large files is slow (for some reason) but this is an old spiffs issue.