Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[Snyk] Upgrade fastify from 4.21.0 to 5.0.0 #370

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

[Snyk] Upgrade fastify from 4.21.0 to 5.0.0 #370

wants to merge 1 commit into from
+454 −453

Conversation

lholmquist
Copy link
Member

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to upgrade fastify from 4.21.0 to 5.0.0.

ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.

⚠️ Warning: This PR contains major version upgrade(s), and may be a breaking change.

  • The recommended version is 24 versions ahead of your current version.

  • The recommended version was released on a month ago.

Issues fixed by the recommended upgrade:

Issue Score Exploit Maturity
medium severity Cross-site Scripting (XSS)
SNYK-JS-COOKIE-8163060		 386 No Known Exploit
medium severity Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
SNYK-JS-FINDMYWAY-8055229		 386 No Known Exploit
Release notes
Package name: fastify

@snyk-bot
feat: upgrade fastify from 4.21.0 to 5.0.0
df3aa8b 
Snyk has created this PR to upgrade fastify from 4.21.0 to 5.0.0.

See this package in npm:
fastify

See this project in Snyk:
https://app.snyk.io/org/nodeshift-agg/project/53f94480-e7ae-41d2-985c-270fae345664?utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&page=upgrade-pr
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@lholmquist @snyk-bot