-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Complete back transformation from EO to bytecode #108
Comments
volodya-lombrozo
added a commit
to volodya-lombrozo/jeo-maven-plugin
that referenced
this issue
Sep 28, 2023
volodya-lombrozo
added a commit
to volodya-lombrozo/jeo-maven-plugin
that referenced
this issue
Sep 28, 2023
volodya-lombrozo
added a commit
to volodya-lombrozo/jeo-maven-plugin
that referenced
this issue
Sep 28, 2023
volodya-lombrozo
added a commit
to volodya-lombrozo/jeo-maven-plugin
that referenced
this issue
Sep 28, 2023
volodya-lombrozo
added a commit
to volodya-lombrozo/jeo-maven-plugin
that referenced
this issue
Sep 29, 2023
volodya-lombrozo
added a commit
to volodya-lombrozo/jeo-maven-plugin
that referenced
this issue
Sep 29, 2023
volodya-lombrozo
added a commit
to volodya-lombrozo/jeo-maven-plugin
that referenced
this issue
Sep 29, 2023
volodya-lombrozo
added a commit
to volodya-lombrozo/jeo-maven-plugin
that referenced
this issue
Sep 29, 2023
volodya-lombrozo
added a commit
to volodya-lombrozo/jeo-maven-plugin
that referenced
this issue
Sep 29, 2023
volodya-lombrozo
added a commit
to volodya-lombrozo/jeo-maven-plugin
that referenced
this issue
Sep 29, 2023
volodya-lombrozo
added a commit
to volodya-lombrozo/jeo-maven-plugin
that referenced
this issue
Sep 29, 2023
volodya-lombrozo
added a commit
to volodya-lombrozo/jeo-maven-plugin
that referenced
this issue
Sep 29, 2023
volodya-lombrozo
added a commit
to volodya-lombrozo/jeo-maven-plugin
that referenced
this issue
Sep 29, 2023
volodya-lombrozo
added a commit
to volodya-lombrozo/jeo-maven-plugin
that referenced
this issue
Sep 29, 2023
This was referenced Sep 30, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Right now we just compile bytecode from
listing
element of EO (xmir
). So it's actually not a transformation - we just copy bytecode, save it intolisting
and then just create bytecode from that listing:By doing this we actually ignore the results created by
BytecodeRepresentation#toEO
, which is wrong, of course. Moreover it keeps open the question about the format of EO representation and blocks the next issues: #102, #93, #60.Hence, we have to create bytecode honestly from the entire EO representation without using
listing
.Entry point for the implementation is
EoRepresentation#toBytecode()
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: