Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add SPARQL expansion for 'mutually spatially disjoint with’. #615

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 12, 2022
Merged

Add SPARQL expansion for 'mutually spatially disjoint with’. #615

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 12, 2022

Conversation

balhoff
Copy link
Member

@balhoff balhoff commented Jul 11, 2022

Fixes #600.

@balhoff balhoff mentioned this pull request Jul 11, 2022
Merged
matentzn
matentzn approved these changes Jul 12, 2022
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@matentzn matentzn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I dont like it that OMO labels and defs are in the ro edit file but I will deal with all that in one sweep in a future PR.

I have not tested the CONSTRUCT query, but it reads ok!

@balhoff
Copy link
Member Author

balhoff commented Jul 12, 2022

I dont like it that OMO labels and defs are in the ro edit file but I will deal with all that in one sweep in a future PR.

Yes, you are right, but I didn't want to take on adding an import for this PR...

@balhoff balhoff merged commit 8691ce0 into master Jul 12, 2022
@balhoff balhoff deleted the issue-600 branch July 12, 2022 13:21
@anitacaron anitacaron mentioned this pull request Jul 18, 2022
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@matentzn matentzn matentzn approved these changes

@dosumis dosumis dosumis approved these changes

@shawntanzk shawntanzk Awaiting requested review from shawntanzk

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Expansion for RO:0002171
3 participants
@balhoff @dosumis @matentzn