Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Flow EVM] Backport of #6289 #6290

Merged

Conversation

ramtinms
Copy link
Contributor

@ramtinms ramtinms commented Jul 31, 2024

Backport of #6289

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jul 31, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 75.00000% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 41.55%. Comparing base (dd9faee) to head (9dbe3c8).

Files Patch % Lines
fvm/evm/emulator/state/delta.go 33.33% 1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
fvm/evm/emulator/state/stateDB.go 85.71% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@                       Coverage Diff                        @@
##           feature/crescendo-previewnet    #6290      +/-   ##
================================================================
+ Coverage                         41.54%   41.55%   +0.01%     
================================================================
  Files                              1992     1992              
  Lines                            141553   141556       +3     
================================================================
+ Hits                              58802    58827      +25     
+ Misses                            76627    76609      -18     
+ Partials                           6124     6120       -4     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 41.55% <75.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@ramtinms ramtinms marked this pull request as ready for review August 1, 2024 16:22
@ramtinms ramtinms requested a review from sideninja August 1, 2024 16:34
@j1010001 j1010001 requested a review from SupunS August 2, 2024 15:27
Comment on lines +211 to +215
// if already set to be self destructed, return
_, found := d.toBeDestructed[addr]
if found {
return nil
}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not sure: should this maybe checked before other (address exist) check?

@ramtinms ramtinms merged commit 7e9174b into feature/crescendo-previewnet Aug 2, 2024
56 checks passed
@ramtinms ramtinms deleted the ramtin/evm-patch-self-destruct branch August 2, 2024 17:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants