[New Designs] Update Dashboard view to match new design

[aanorbel]

Fixes ooni/probe#2588

Proposed Changes

• Update XML designs
• Convert ProgressFragment to kotlin

.	.

[aanorbel]

@agrabeli , We have been showing test_name on the test progress fragment but the new designs say we use the test suite name in the copy. I think we need a new copy for this section which may be different from the designs. What do you think.

[agrabeli]

Thanks @aanorbel for your question (though I feel like I may be missing some context). Is the goal to display (for example) Websites running in the test progress section, as opposed to Web Connectivity running? If that is the case, what new copy would be needed? Can we use the existing test suite copy (Websites, Instant Messaging, etc), or would we need new strings for Websites running, Instant Messaging running, etc?

Overall, why is this change needed? While I can see that perhaps having "obscure" experiment names is not preferable from a UX perspective, at the same time it may be more interesting to see (for example) that "the WhatsApp test is running, the Signal test is running..." than "Instant Messaging running"...

[aanorbel]

The new design calls for the test suite to be used instead of the test name. Wanted to know which side you're on.

[agrabeli]

@aanorbel I'd personally prefer keeping the test names in the progress bar as I personally like seeing which experiment is running, and which experiment doesn't run (for example, due to network issues etc). I also find it more informative seeing that (for example) "WhatsApp is running" than "Instant Messaging is running" (though I realize that not everyone is familiar with the test names, and that some test names are not very descriptive). But if the consensus is to replace the test names with the test suites, we could do that.

[bassosimone]

I second what @agrabeli write. In case of bugs, it helps us to know what was failing. "The app crashed while running WhatsApp" is more actionable than "the app crashed whole it was running Instant Messaging".

I think the main reason why this issue popped up is because the "Websites" group says "Web Connectivity". I would not be opposed to replace "Web Connectivity" with "Websites" because there's a 1:1 mapping.

On further reflection, for IM it definitely makes sense to keep the test names explicit because people know about that.

[bassosimone]

Just minor changes

[bassosimone]

🐳