Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

9283 review followup #194

Conversation

JustinKuli
Copy link
Member

Resolves some final comments from the previous PR review, as well as an issue gosec noticed.

Loop variables are re-used in different iterations, which means taking
the address of one can lead to unexpected results.

Signed-off-by: Justin Kulikauskas <jkulikau@redhat.com>
This might prevent conditions of the same type from being duplicated
in the status.

Signed-off-by: Justin Kulikauskas <jkulikau@redhat.com>
@JustinKuli
Copy link
Member Author

/cc @yiraeChristineKim

There was already one like this when the OperatorGroup was not being
specified in the OperatorPolicy, but this helps keep things complete.

Signed-off-by: Justin Kulikauskas <jkulikau@redhat.com>
Copy link
Member

@dhaiducek dhaiducek left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice little set of updates! 🙂

@@ -96,6 +96,8 @@ type OperatorPolicyStatus struct {
// Most recent compliance state of the policy
ComplianceState policyv1.ComplianceState `json:"compliant,omitempty"`
// Historic details on the condition of the policy
// +listType=map
// +listMapKey=type
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh yeah. This is neat. 🥳

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 1, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dhaiducek, JustinKuli

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [JustinKuli,dhaiducek]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants