Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: remove link to non existing file #2246

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 30, 2024

Conversation

maryliag
Copy link
Contributor

The PR #2171 removed the postgres example, but there was still a link to the file on the README file, which was now returning 404.

This PR remove the mention to the no longer existing file

@maryliag maryliag requested a review from a team May 27, 2024 17:14
@github-actions github-actions bot requested a review from rauno56 May 27, 2024 17:14
@maryliag maryliag changed the title remove link to non existing file chore: remove link to non existing file May 27, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 27, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 90.38%. Comparing base (dfb2dff) to head (033e99a).
Report is 143 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2246      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   90.97%   90.38%   -0.60%     
==========================================
  Files         146      148       +2     
  Lines        7492     7509      +17     
  Branches     1502     1573      +71     
==========================================
- Hits         6816     6787      -29     
- Misses        676      722      +46     

see 44 files with indirect coverage changes

@pichlermarc pichlermarc merged commit 91dec9c into open-telemetry:main May 30, 2024
13 checks passed
@maryliag maryliag deleted the remove-link-pg branch May 30, 2024 16:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants