move most packages into internal

[cyphar]

At the moment all of our internal packages are importable from anywhere. There are several historical reasons for this:

• Docker originally used LXC, but then created a Go container runtime as an internal library (libcontainer) which was used by Docker directly. This meant that containers were created by forking Docker and doing the namespace setup immediately, which turns out to not be a great idea. This library was moved to a separate repo, but was still imported by Docker. So most of the library code was being imported by another project. The OCI was created and libcontainer was wrapped in a binary called "runc", which was then moved to the OCI repo. But Docker still used libcontainer for a little while before switching. So there was a long time when we had to have our APIs be external.
• The internal package system didn't exist until Go 1.4, and it wasn't really widely publicised at the time (I only heard about it a few years ago).

However, there are still modern users of our APIs:

• Kubernetes (specifically cAdvisor and Kubelet) make use of our cgroup libraries fairly heavily and were the first external users from memory. Quite a few other projects also use our cgroup libraries.
• Docker still imports a handful of our APIs, some of which only really exist for Docker's sake and aren't even used within runc (HostDevices comes to mind).

So we can't just move everything into an internal package but we really should move most of it. We do have some users using libcontainer as a library but it is fairly scary because it is fairly easy to misconfigure containers if you use the Process APIs for instance. We should move as many libraries as possible behind an internal package.

This will also make it easier to explain our SemVer policy -- because right now I would argue that SemVer doesn't cover our Go APIs, but I imagine some users are not aware of that. Putting most of libcontainer inside an internal package would solve this problem entirely.

[dims]

taking stock, as of today here's what kubernetes is importing:

[dims@dims-a01 19:14] ~/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes ⟩ rg opencontainers/runc | grep -v vendor | grep "\.go:" | grep -oh "\".*\"" | sort | uniq
"github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/apparmor"
"github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/cgroups"
"github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/cgroups/fs"
"github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/cgroups/fs2"
"github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/cgroups/fscommon"
"github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/cgroups/systemd"
"github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/configs"
"github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/devices"
"github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/utils"

[dims]

and here's what cadvisor is importing:

[dims@dims-a01 19:15] ~/go/src/github.com/google/cadvisor ⟩ rg opencontainers/runc | grep -v vendor | grep "\.go:" | grep -oh "\".*\"" | sort | uniq
"github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer"
"github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/cgroups"
"github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/cgroups/fs"
"github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/cgroups/fs2"
"github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/configs"
"github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/intelrdt"

[kolyshkin]

Let's see if we can remove anything but libcontainer/cgroups...

taking stock, as of today here's what kubernetes is importing:

"github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/apparmor"

The only use is apparmor.IsEnabled().

"github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/configs"

This has some cgroup-related definitions; maybe we can move it to libcontainer/cgroups, leaving backward-compatible aliases in libcontainer/configs for smoother transition.

Same for cadvisor.

"github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/devices"

This should go away once runc 1.0.0 GA is released (see kubernetes/kubernetes@9a86d92)

"github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/utils"

The only use is

func getCgroupV1Path(cgroupPath string) (string, error) {
        cgroupPath = libcontainerutils.CleanPath(cgroupPath)

(and I admit that despite staring at cgroups code for quite a long time I don't fully understand yet why CleanPath is ever needed)

Now for cadvisor, the only pkg that has left is

"github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/intelrdt"

this is very similar to cgroups and I guess we'll have to keep it public.

[kolyshkin]

docker, cri-o, buildah, podman etc uses a lot of stuff from libcontainer/devices, libcontainer/user and so on -- seems that kubernetes and cadvisor is just the tip of the iceberg.

[cyphar]

AFAIK the libcontainer/devices and libcontainers/user stuff that Docker et al uses is fairly minor -- libcontainer/user is kinda needed by higher-level runtimes so we'd need to export it no matter what, while only a few bits of devices are needed (mainly HostDevices and a few other functions that only existed for the purposes of Docker but are in libcontainer because of historical reasons).

[cyphar]

(and I admit that despite staring at cgroups code for quite a long time I don't fully understand yet why CleanPath is ever needed)

It was mostly an abundance of caution because we had cases where lexical path attacks were very trivial against runc, so we added CleanPath to every unsafe path. Once we switch to libpathrs, or move to openat2 hardended paths then CleanPath (and SecureJoin) won't be necessary anymore.

[kolyshkin]

I tried it in #3049 but I do need some input from @opencontainers/runc-maintainers on what the internal path should be (see #3049 (comment) and the following discussion).

Basically, we have three options (under opencontainer/runc/ prefix):

1. internal/ (e.g. internal/logs)
2. libcontainer/internal/ (e.g. libcontainer/internal/logs)
3. internal/libcontainer/ (e.g. internal/libcontainer/logs)

My #3049 implemented approach number 1, while @hqhq thinks it's better to do number 2. Apparently, we need more opinions on that to move forward. Please speak up your mind.

Surely this is not limited to the above three options -- some other variants (e.g. pkg/internal/logs) can be considered as well.

[kolyshkin]

OK, this is obviously not ready for 1.1; moving to 1.2. Would appreciate some input from other @opencontainers/runc-maintainers on this.

[junnplus]

Although not related to this issue, I think we can move the main package into ./cmd/runc to keep the root path clean.

I opened a PR #3521 for it, WDYT.

[kolyshkin]

Moving this to 1.3.0 due to lack of input from @opencontainers/runc-maintainers wrt #3028 (comment)

[kolyshkin]

OK, as a small step forward, we now have internal/ (added by #4099).