Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[RHOAIENG-11527] - [backend] Incorrect values for number of requests … #256

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 27, 2024

Conversation

spolti
Copy link
Member

@spolti spolti commented Aug 20, 2024

…in Kserve Performance metrics
A summarized decision:

Update the chart title to match the approved by UXD. Use "Requests rate per 5 min" the same way as the model mesh to avoid confusion and maintain consistency as it denotes rate instead concrete values.

Description

How Has This Been Tested?

Merge criteria:

  • The commits are squashed in a cohesive manner and have meaningful messages.
  • Testing instructions have been added in the PR body (for PRs involving changes that are not immediately obvious).
  • The developer has manually tested the changes and verified that the changes work

@@ -15,21 +15,23 @@ limitations under the License.

package constants

// ${DASHBOARD_RATE_INTERVAL} is a placeholder for the metrics that needs to receive values from the dashboard at the
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This should be ${REQUEST_RATE_INTERVAL}?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

actually this comment needs to be removed, thanks for the heads up.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

updated, thanks

…in Kserve Performance metrics

Signed-off-by: Spolti <fspolti@redhat.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@israel-hdez israel-hdez left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

We are moving forward this PR. This part is working fine, but there seems to be an issue in the dashboard leading to a bad chart.

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 26, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: israel-hdez, spolti

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 680ac78 into opendatahub-io:main Aug 27, 2024
5 checks passed
@spolti spolti deleted the RHOAIENG-11527 branch August 27, 2024 00:05
spolti added a commit to spolti/odh-model-controller that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2024
…in Kserve Performance metrics (opendatahub-io#256)

Signed-off-by: Spolti <fspolti@redhat.com>
openshift-merge-bot bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2024
…in Kserve Performance metrics (#256) (#261)

Signed-off-by: Spolti <fspolti@redhat.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants