FC-0001: Account pages -> micro-frontend#30336
FC-0001: Account pages -> micro-frontend#30336abdullahwaheed merged 7 commits intoopenedx:masterfrom
Conversation
|
Thanks for the pull request, @UvgenGen! Please note that it may take us up to several weeks or months to complete a review and merge your PR. Feel free to add as much of the following information to the ticket as you can:
All technical communication about the code itself will be done via the GitHub pull request interface. As a reminder, our process documentation is here. Please let us know once your PR is ready for our review and all tests are green. |
|
@dianakhuang This seems to be with arch-bom, do you mind reviewing and merging? |
94abf32 to
d306a99
Compare
bb02e86 to
6549a21
Compare
d2aa853 to
2a54f42
Compare
|
@UvgenGen i have reviewed and tested your changes and resolved merge conflicts locally. I cannot push my changes in your forked repo. Please either give me write access to your repo or i'll provide the patch file for changes. |
|
@abdullahwaheed Could you provide the patch file please? |
|
@UvgenGen the patch couldn't created for all the commits as i have merged it with master and resolved conflicts only. Could you please rebase it with master and i'll help you resolve the conflicts |
2a54f42 to
a54eff5
Compare
|
@abdullahwaheed yes, sure. I rebased this PR and resolved conflicts. Files affected: |
abdullahwaheed
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
tested with respective changes. LGTM
|
@UvgenGen could you please rebase it again |
a54eff5 to
6658377
Compare
|
@abdullahwaheed PR rebased) |
|
@UvgenGen should the name of this PR be updated? We're after olive, can this now be merged? |
|
@e0d I removed |
|
@dianakhuang is this good to merge now? |
|
I will try to get it on FED-BOM's agenda to review and help get this merged. Very excited for this to land! |
|
@UvgenGen need rebasing again due to frequent changes in platform :) |
6658377 to
ed4e690
Compare
|
@abdullahwaheed PR rebased) |
|
Hi @UvgenGen @arbrandes @dianakhuang - is this good to merge once the branch conflicts are resolved? |
ed4e690 to
027e429
Compare
|
@mphilbrick211 PR rebased, conflicts resolved) |
|
@arbrandes @dianakhuang Would one of you be able to merge this? |
|
@UvgenGen 🎉 Your pull request was merged! Please take a moment to answer a two question survey so we can improve your experience in the future. |
|
EdX Release Notice: This PR has been deployed to the staging environment in preparation for a release to production. |
|
EdX Release Notice: This PR has been deployed to the production environment. |
This reverts commit 0f02c7b.
feat: Account and profile MFE legacy removal - redeployment * Revert "Revert "FC-0001: Account pages -> micro-frontend (#30336)" (#31888)" This reverts commit 90c4ca6. * refactor: removed filters test from user_api accounts --------- Co-authored-by: Bilal Qamar <59555732+BilalQamar95@users.noreply.github.com>
Merge after the Olive release.
Description
replaced edx-platform's older implementation of the Django-server-side rendering of the following pages with new micro-frontend-based implementations:
** Account Settings
PR to frontend-platform: openedx/frontend-platform#326
PR to frontend-component-header: openedx/frontend-component-header#210
Supporting information
openedx/public-engineering#71
Original Jira Issue: https://openedx.atlassian.net/browse/DEPR-17