Skip to content

Conversation

@miguelhbrito
Copy link
Contributor

@miguelhbrito miguelhbrito commented Oct 2, 2025

mipereir@mipereir-thinkpadp1gen4i:~/myprojects/ocm-cli$ ./ocm gcp update wif-config --help
--skip-federated-project-verification Skip federated project verification

mipereir@mipereir-thinkpadp1gen4i:~/myprojects/ocm-cli$ ./ocm gcp update wif-config mipereir-metrics-test-pr --federated-project sda-ccs-3
...
2025/10/09 14:16:43 Verifying wif-config '2lqn8pp1v0mcnl5uljlfk2mtp5d37893'...
2025/10/09 14:16:52 Ensuring new workload identity pool has recent traffic...
2025/10/09 14:16:53 Trying again in 1 seconds...
2025/10/09 14:16:55 Trying again in 2 seconds...
2025/10/09 14:16:57 Trying again in 4 seconds...
2025/10/09 14:17:02 Trying again in 8 seconds...
2025/10/09 14:17:10 Trying again in 16 seconds...
2025/10/09 14:17:27 Ensuring old workload identity pool is still there and not being used...
2025/10/09 14:17:27 wif-config '2lqn8pp1v0mcnl5uljlfk2mtp5d37893' updated successfully.

mipereir@mipereir-thinkpadp1gen4i:~/myprojects/ocm-cli$ ./ocm gcp update wif-config mipereir-metrics-test-pr --federated-project sda-ccs-1 --skip-federated-project-verification
...
2025/10/09 14:19:28 Verifying wif-config '2lqn8pp1v0mcnl5uljlfk2mtp5d37893'...
2025/10/09 14:19:37 wif-config '2lqn8pp1v0mcnl5uljlfk2mtp5d37893' updated successfully.

@miguelhbrito miguelhbrito force-pushed the wif-pool-usage-on-update branch 3 times, most recently from b752b86 to 75dfae9 Compare October 2, 2025 19:19
@miguelhbrito miguelhbrito force-pushed the wif-pool-usage-on-update branch 2 times, most recently from f3604b3 to 719f307 Compare October 9, 2025 14:26
@miguelhbrito miguelhbrito force-pushed the wif-pool-usage-on-update branch from 719f307 to db5872e Compare October 9, 2025 14:32
@rcampos2029 rcampos2029 merged commit dfb52ff into openshift-online:main Oct 9, 2025
8 of 9 checks passed
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 9, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 9, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: miguelhbrito, rcampos2029

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

miguelhbrito added a commit to miguelhbrito/ocm-cli that referenced this pull request Oct 20, 2025
rcampos2029 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2025
rcampos2029 added a commit to rcampos2029/ocm-cli that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2025
- Update README.md
- Build a source container (openshift-online#874)
- update wif config to enable support for federated project (openshift-online#884)
- pool usage after update (openshift-online#888)
- Revert "pool usage after update (openshift-online#888)" (openshift-online#901)
- Red Hat Konflux update ocm-cli (openshift-online#882)
- update golang version (openshift-online#899)
- chore(deps): update konflux references
- added OWNERS file (openshift-online#937)
- OCM-2093 | fix: misaligned list users result
- OCM-2093 | fix: check eventual error raised by tabwriter's flush operation
@rcampos2029 rcampos2029 mentioned this pull request Nov 25, 2025
rcampos2029 added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 27, 2025
- Update README.md
- Build a source container (#874)
- update wif config to enable support for federated project (#884)
- pool usage after update (#888)
- Revert "pool usage after update (#888)" (#901)
- Red Hat Konflux update ocm-cli (#882)
- update golang version (#899)
- chore(deps): update konflux references
- added OWNERS file (#937)
- OCM-2093 | fix: misaligned list users result
- OCM-2093 | fix: check eventual error raised by tabwriter's flush operation
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants