-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 151
added OWNERS file #937
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
added OWNERS file #937
Conversation
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: rcampos2029 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
WalkthroughA new OWNERS file is added to specify repository approvers, designating rcampos2029 as an approver for the codebase. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes Pre-merge checks and finishing touches❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Tip 📝 Customizable high-level summaries are now available in beta!You can now customize how CodeRabbit generates the high-level summary in your pull requests — including its content, structure, tone, and formatting.
Example instruction:
Note: This feature is currently in beta for Pro-tier users, and pricing will be announced later. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
OWNERS (1)
1-2: Consider designating multiple approvers for project continuity.The OWNERS file currently designates only one approver. For maintainability and project resilience, consider adding additional approvers to ensure code review capacity and continuity in case the primary approver is unavailable.
If multiple maintainers should be designated, apply this diff:
approvers: - rcampos2029 + - <additional_approver>Alternatively, if this single-approver structure aligns with the project's governance model, this can be disregarded.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Cache: Disabled due to data retention organization setting
Knowledge base: Disabled due to Reviews -> Disable Knowledge Base setting
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
OWNERS(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (5)
- GitHub Check: Red Hat Konflux / ocm-cli-on-pull-request
- GitHub Check: Test (ubuntu-latest)
- GitHub Check: Test (macos-latest)
- GitHub Check: Test (windows-latest)
- GitHub Check: Lint
- Update README.md - Build a source container (openshift-online#874) - update wif config to enable support for federated project (openshift-online#884) - pool usage after update (openshift-online#888) - Revert "pool usage after update (openshift-online#888)" (openshift-online#901) - Red Hat Konflux update ocm-cli (openshift-online#882) - update golang version (openshift-online#899) - chore(deps): update konflux references - added OWNERS file (openshift-online#937) - OCM-2093 | fix: misaligned list users result - OCM-2093 | fix: check eventual error raised by tabwriter's flush operation
- Update README.md - Build a source container (#874) - update wif config to enable support for federated project (#884) - pool usage after update (#888) - Revert "pool usage after update (#888)" (#901) - Red Hat Konflux update ocm-cli (#882) - update golang version (#899) - chore(deps): update konflux references - added OWNERS file (#937) - OCM-2093 | fix: misaligned list users result - OCM-2093 | fix: check eventual error raised by tabwriter's flush operation
No description provided.