Skip to content

Conversation

openshift-cherrypick-robot

This is an automated cherry-pick of #415

/assign chrischdi

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Detected clone of Jira Issue OCPBUGS-51305 with correct target version. Will retitle the PR to link to the clone.
/retitle [release-4.17] OCPBUGS-63167: ccm: disable unused secure-serving port and webhook

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #415

/assign chrischdi

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot changed the title [release-4.17] OCPBUGS-51305: ccm: disable unused secure-serving port and webhook [release-4.17] OCPBUGS-63167: ccm: disable unused secure-serving port and webhook Oct 16, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Oct 16, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-63167, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-63166 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but it is New instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #415

/assign chrischdi

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Oct 16, 2025
@chrischdi
Copy link
Contributor

/test lint

@shellyyang1989
Copy link

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@shellyyang1989: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-63167, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-63166 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but it is POST instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@chrischdi
Copy link
Contributor

/jira refresh
/label backport-risk-assessed
/lgtm
/approve
/retest-required

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Oct 21, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@chrischdi: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-63167, which is valid.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.17.z) matches configured target version for branch (4.17.z)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • release note text is set and does not match the template
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-63166 is in the state Verified, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA))
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-63166 targets the "4.18.z" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.18.0, 4.18.z
  • bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @sunzhaohua2

In response to this:

/jira refresh
/label backport-risk-assessed
/lgtm
/approve
/retest-required

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from sunzhaohua2 October 21, 2025 12:12
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 21, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 21, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: chrischdi
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign elmiko for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. label Oct 21, 2025
@chrischdi
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

@chrischdi
Copy link
Contributor

/hold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Oct 21, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 21, 2025

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-nutanix-ovn 86c86ab link false /test e2e-nutanix-ovn
ci/prow/level0-clusterinfra-azure-ipi-proxy-tests 86c86ab link false /test level0-clusterinfra-azure-ipi-proxy-tests

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants