Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1878163: Updating Dockerfile baseimages to mach ocp-build-data config #698

Conversation

openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This PR is autogenerated by the ocp-build-data-enforcer.
It updates the base images in the Dockerfile used for promotion in order to ensure it
matches the configuration in the ocp-build-data repository used
for producing release artifacts.

Instead of merging this PR you can also create an alternate PR that includes the changes found here.

If you believe the content of this PR is incorrect, please contact the dptp team in
#aos-art.

This PR is autogenerated by the [ocp-build-data-enforcer][1].
It updates the base images in the Dockerfile used for promotion in order to ensure it
matches the configuration in the [ocp-build-data repository][2] used
for producing release artifacts.

Instead of merging this PR you can also create an alternate PR that includes the changes found here.

If you believe the content of this PR is incorrect, please contact the dptp team in
#aos-art.

[1]: https://github.com/openshift/ci-tools/tree/master/cmd/ocp-build-data-enforcer
[2]: https://github.com/openshift/ocp-build-data/tree/openshift-4.6/images
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. label Sep 17, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1878163, which is valid. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.6.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.6.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

In response to this:

Bug 1878163: Updating Dockerfile baseimages to mach ocp-build-data config

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Sep 17, 2020
@periklis
Copy link
Contributor

/assign @periklis

@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ RUN make build

FROM registry.svc.ci.openshift.org/ocp/4.6:cli as origincli

FROM registry.svc.ci.openshift.org/ocp/4.6:base-8
FROM registry.svc.ci.openshift.org/ocp/4.6:base
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Need to test this localy first. This may block local builds.

@periklis
Copy link
Contributor

/hold

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Sep 17, 2020
@periklis
Copy link
Contributor

periklis commented Sep 17, 2020

As expected the switch back to:

FROM registry.svc.ci.openshift.org/ocp/4.6:base

breaks local builds.

@jupierce Can we enforce to use here FROM registry.svc.ci.openshift.org/ocp/4.6:base-8 somehow w/o the bot overriding this directive all the time?

@vimalk78
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

1 similar comment
@yselkowitz
Copy link

/retest

@periklis
Copy link
Contributor

Hey folks, Can we stop putting retest until this PR is adapted to fix our local builds?

@jupierce
Copy link
Contributor

@periklis 4.6:base is now based on rhel-8. I'm not sure why this would break local builds. Will reach out in slack.

@periklis
Copy link
Contributor

@periklis 4.6:base is now based on rhel-8. I'm not sure why this would break local builds. Will reach out in slack.

I am not sure if we still use up2date repos to install openssl and rsync on this container, but resolving the dependencies fails in the end due to python:

           Requires: librpmbuild.so.3()(64bit)                                                                                                                                                 
           Removing: rpm-build-libs-4.11.3-43.el7.x86_64 (@anaconda/7.8)                                                                                                                       
               librpmbuild.so.3()(64bit)                                                       
           Updated By: rpm-build-libs-4.14.2-37.el8.x86_64 (xyz5)
              ~librpmbuild.so.8()(64bit)                                                       
Error: Package: rpm-python-4.11.3-43.el7.x86_64 (@anaconda/7.8)
           Requires: librpmsign.so.1()(64bit)                                                                                                                                                             Removing: rpm-build-libs-4.11.3-43.el7.x86_64 (@anaconda/7.8)       
               librpmsign.so.1()(64bit) 
           Updated By: rpm-build-libs-4.14.2-37.el8.x86_64 (xyz5)
              ~librpmsign.so.8()(64bit)                                                                                                                                                        
Error: Package: rpm-python-4.11.3-43.el7.x86_64 (@anaconda/7.8)
           Requires: librpm.so.3()(64bit)
           Removing: rpm-libs-4.11.3-43.el7.x86_64 (@anaconda/7.8)
               librpm.so.3()(64bit)
           Updated By: rpm-libs-4.14.2-37.el8.x86_64 (xyz5)
              ~librpm.so.8()(64bit)
Error: Package: python-libs-2.7.5-88.el7.x86_64 (@anaconda/7.8)
           Requires: libreadline.so.6()(64bit)
           Removing: readline-6.2-11.el7.x86_64 (@anaconda/7.8)
               libreadline.so.6()(64bit)
           Updated By: readline-7.0-10.el8.x86_64 (xyz5)
              ~libreadline.so.7()(64bit)
Error: Package: rpm-python-4.11.3-43.el7.x86_64 (@anaconda/7.8)
           Requires: librpmio.so.3()(64bit)
           Removing: rpm-libs-4.11.3-43.el7.x86_64 (@anaconda/7.8)
               librpmio.so.3()(64bit)
           Updated By: rpm-libs-4.14.2-37.el8.x86_64 (xyz5)
              ~librpmio.so.8()(64bit)
Error: Package: rpm-python-4.11.3-43.el7.x86_64 (@anaconda/7.8)
           Requires: liblua-5.1.so()(64bit)
           Removing: lua-5.1.4-15.el7.x86_64 (@anaconda/7.8)
               liblua-5.1.so()(64bit)
           Updated By: lua-5.3.4-11.el8.x86_64 (xyz)
               Not found
Error: Package: rpm-python-4.11.3-43.el7.x86_64 (@anaconda/7.8)
....

@jcantrill
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

1 similar comment
@jcantrill
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

@jcantrill
Copy link
Contributor

/approve
/lgtm

@jcantrill
Copy link
Contributor

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Sep 22, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 22, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jcantrill, openshift-bot

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Sep 22, 2020
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

3 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 54a1aeb into openshift:master Sep 23, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-bot: Some pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

The following pull requests linked via external trackers have not merged:

These pull request must merge or be unlinked from the Bugzilla bug in order for it to move to the next state.

Bugzilla bug 1878163 has not been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1878163: Updating Dockerfile baseimages to mach ocp-build-data config

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@periklis
Copy link
Contributor

For the record, we need to pull the base image locally once again before starting the build:

podman pull registry.svc.ci.openshift.org/ocp/4.6:base

pmoogi-redhat pushed a commit to pmoogi-redhat/cluster-logging-operator that referenced this pull request Apr 26, 2022
…le-baseimages-to-mach-ocp-build-data-config

Bug 1878163: Updating Dockerfile baseimages to mach ocp-build-data config
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants