Revert "OCPBUGS-12856: Support Device Plugin Resources For Smart NIC and DPU Hosts"

[dgoodwin]

Reverts #1721

Test revert, something has changed with disruption, we want to see if this is involved.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@dgoodwin: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-12856, which is invalid:

• expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, POST, but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

Reverts #1721

Test revert, something has changed with disruption, we want to see if this is involved.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[dgoodwin]

/payload-aggregate periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.14-e2e-azure-ovn-upgrade 10

[openshift-ci]

@dgoodwin: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(job|aggregate) command

• periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.14-e2e-azure-ovn-upgrade

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/2fc3c1b0-edc2-11ed-8bcb-35e2887a389c-0

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dgoodwin
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign knobunc for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[bertinatto]

/retest-required

[bertinatto]

It seems like this reverted solved the problem. Doing another run to have more data for tomorrow.

/payload-aggregate periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.14-e2e-azure-ovn-upgrade 10

[openshift-ci]

@bertinatto: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(job|aggregate) command

• periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.14-e2e-azure-ovn-upgrade

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/3073bb80-ede8-11ed-82a5-81fb3313b155-0

[dgoodwin]

I fear this isn't it, our first batch of 10 jobs, only 8 installed, disruption for kube-api was 2 0 6 2 2 7 6 8 for an average of 4.1.
Second batch again only 8 installed, disruption for kube-api was 5 4 10 8 5 5 7 9 for an average of 6.6.

Looking at https://grafana-loki.ci.openshift.org/d/ISnBj4LVk/disruption?from=now-30d&to=now&var-platform=azure&var-percentile=P50&var-backend=kube-api-new-connections&var-releases=4.14&var-from_releases=4.14&var-networks=ovn&var-topologies=ha&var-architectures=amd64&var-min_job_runs=10&orgId=1 our average yesterday was 5.7, so I fear this is probably not our regression. (if there even is a regression)

/close

[openshift-ci]

@dgoodwin: Closed this PR.

Details

In response to this:

I fear this isn't it, our first batch of 10 jobs, only 8 installed, disruption for kube-api was 2 0 6 2 2 7 6 8 for an average of 4.1.
Second batch again only 8 installed, disruption for kube-api was 5 4 10 8 5 5 7 9 for an average of 6.6.

Looking at https://grafana-loki.ci.openshift.org/d/ISnBj4LVk/disruption?from=now-30d&to=now&var-platform=azure&var-percentile=P50&var-backend=kube-api-new-connections&var-releases=4.14&var-from_releases=4.14&var-networks=ovn&var-topologies=ha&var-architectures=amd64&var-min_job_runs=10&orgId=1 our average yesterday was 5.7, so I fear this is probably not our regression. (if there even is a regression)

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@dgoodwin: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-12856. The bug has been updated to no longer refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

Reverts #1721

Test revert, something has changed with disruption, we want to see if this is involved.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.