-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 95
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[release-4.8] OCPBUGS-580: Gather status of the cephclusters.ceph.rook.io reso… #668
[release-4.8] OCPBUGS-580: Gather status of the cephclusters.ceph.rook.io reso… #668
Conversation
@tremes: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@tremes: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@tremes: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@tremes: This pull request references [Jira Issue OCPBUGS-580](https://issues.redhat.com//browse/OCPBUGS-580), which is invalid:
Comment In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@tremes: This pull request references [Jira Issue OCPBUGS-580](https://issues.redhat.com//browse/OCPBUGS-580), which is invalid:
Comment In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@tremes: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@tremes: This pull request references [Jira Issue OCPBUGS-580](https://issues.redhat.com//browse/OCPBUGS-580), which is invalid:
Comment In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@tremes: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/override ci/prow/lint |
@tremes: Overrode contexts on behalf of tremes: ci/prow/lint In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/retest |
/label backport-risk-assessed |
/label cherry-pick-approved |
/retest |
1 similar comment
/retest |
/jira refresh |
@tremes: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-580, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 6 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Simple backport
/lgtm
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: rluders, tremes The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/test e2e-agnostic-upgrade |
@tremes: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
@tremes: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-580 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER] This PR has been included in build ose-insights-operator-container-v4.8.0-202311261141.p0.g53425de.assembly.stream for distgit ose-insights-operator. |
4.8 backport of the #654
Categories
Sample Archive
docs/insights-archive-sample/config/storage/openshift-storage/ocs-storagecluster-cephcluster.json
Documentation
path/to/documentation.md
Unit Tests
pkg/gatherers/clusterconfig/ceph_cluster_test.go
Privacy
Yes. There are no sensitive data in the newly collected information.
Changelog
Breaking Changes
No
References
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-580
https://access.redhat.com/solutions/???