Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[release-4.17] OCPBUGS-39393: collect some nmstate customresources (#… #989

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 10, 2024

Conversation

tremes
Copy link
Contributor

@tremes tremes commented Sep 3, 2024

…986)

This PR implements a new data enhancement to...

Categories

  • Bugfix
  • [] Data Enhancement
  • Feature
  • Backporting
  • Others (CI, Infrastructure, Documentation)

Sample Archive

  • path/to/sample_data.json

Documentation

  • path/to/documentation.md

Unit Tests

  • path/to/file_test.go

Privacy

Yes. There are no sensitive data in the newly collected information.

Changelog

Breaking Changes

Yes/No

References

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-39393
https://access.redhat.com/solutions/???

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Sep 3, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@tremes: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-39393, which is invalid:

  • release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required". For more information you can reference the OpenShift Bug Process.

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

…986)

This PR implements a new data enhancement to...

Categories

  • Bugfix
  • [] Data Enhancement
  • Feature
  • Backporting
  • Others (CI, Infrastructure, Documentation)

Sample Archive

  • path/to/sample_data.json

Documentation

  • path/to/documentation.md

Unit Tests

  • path/to/file_test.go

Privacy

Yes. There are no sensitive data in the newly collected information.

Changelog

Breaking Changes

Yes/No

References

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/???
https://access.redhat.com/solutions/???

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from ncaak September 3, 2024 10:28
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Sep 3, 2024
@tremes
Copy link
Contributor Author

tremes commented Sep 3, 2024

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Sep 3, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@tremes: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-39393, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

9 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.17.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.17.0)
  • bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • release note type set to "Release Note Not Required"
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-39111 is in the state ON_QA, which is one of the valid states (MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED)
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-39111 is in the state ON_QA, which is one of the valid states (MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED)
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-39111 targets the "4.18.0" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.18.0
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-39111 targets the "4.18.0" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.18.0
  • bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @BaiyangZhou

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Sep 3, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@tremes: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-39393, which is valid.

9 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.17.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.17.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • release note type set to "Release Note Not Required"
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-39111 is in the state ON_QA, which is one of the valid states (MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED)
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-39111 is in the state ON_QA, which is one of the valid states (MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED)
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-39111 targets the "4.18.0" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.18.0
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-39111 targets the "4.18.0" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.18.0
  • bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @BaiyangZhou

In response to this:

…986)

This PR implements a new data enhancement to...

Categories

  • Bugfix
  • [] Data Enhancement
  • Feature
  • Backporting
  • Others (CI, Infrastructure, Documentation)

Sample Archive

  • path/to/sample_data.json

Documentation

  • path/to/documentation.md

Unit Tests

  • path/to/file_test.go

Privacy

Yes. There are no sensitive data in the newly collected information.

Changelog

Breaking Changes

Yes/No

References

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-39393
https://access.redhat.com/solutions/???

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@tremes
Copy link
Contributor Author

tremes commented Sep 4, 2024

/retest

@tremes
Copy link
Contributor Author

tremes commented Sep 4, 2024

/label backport-risk-assessed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. label Sep 4, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@ncaak ncaak left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 9, 2024
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 9, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ncaak, tremes

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@tremes
Copy link
Contributor Author

tremes commented Sep 9, 2024

/test e2e-agnostic-upgrade

@BaiyangZhou
Copy link

/label cherry-pick-approved

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label Sep 10, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD fe90706 and 2 for PR HEAD 40af111 in total

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 10, 2024

@tremes: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit d44b5f1 into openshift:release-4.17 Sep 10, 2024
9 checks passed
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@tremes: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-39393: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-39393 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

…986)

This PR implements a new data enhancement to...

Categories

  • Bugfix
  • [] Data Enhancement
  • Feature
  • Backporting
  • Others (CI, Infrastructure, Documentation)

Sample Archive

  • path/to/sample_data.json

Documentation

  • path/to/documentation.md

Unit Tests

  • path/to/file_test.go

Privacy

Yes. There are no sensitive data in the newly collected information.

Changelog

Breaking Changes

Yes/No

References

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-39393
https://access.redhat.com/solutions/???

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@tremes
Copy link
Contributor Author

tremes commented Sep 10, 2024

/cherry-pick release-4.16

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@tremes: #989 failed to apply on top of branch "release-4.16":

Applying: OCPBUGS-39393: collect some nmstate customresources (#986)
.git/rebase-apply/patch:4448: trailing whitespace.
      interfaces: 
.git/rebase-apply/patch:4468: trailing whitespace.
      interfaces: 
warning: 2 lines add whitespace errors.
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
M	docs/gathered-data.md
M	pkg/gatherers/clusterconfig/clusterconfig_gatherer.go
A	pkg/gatherers/conditional/filter_and_gather_container_logs.go
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
CONFLICT (modify/delete): pkg/gatherers/conditional/filter_and_gather_container_logs.go deleted in HEAD and modified in OCPBUGS-39393: collect some nmstate customresources (#986). Version OCPBUGS-39393: collect some nmstate customresources (#986) of pkg/gatherers/conditional/filter_and_gather_container_logs.go left in tree.
Auto-merging pkg/gatherers/clusterconfig/clusterconfig_gatherer.go
Auto-merging docs/gathered-data.md
error: Failed to merge in the changes.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch
Patch failed at 0001 OCPBUGS-39393: collect some nmstate customresources (#986)
When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.16

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

tremes added a commit to tremes/insights-operator that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2024
tremes added a commit to tremes/insights-operator that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2024
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER]

Distgit: ose-insights-operator
This PR has been included in build ose-insights-operator-container-v4.17.0-202409100637.p0.gd44b5f1.assembly.stream.el9.
All builds following this will include this PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants