Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

pkg/asset/machines/aws/machinesets: Give workers public IPs (for now) #927

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 17, 2018

Conversation

wking
Copy link
Member

@wking wking commented Dec 17, 2018

Workers have not had public IPs since (at least) we moved them to cluster-API creation in e2dc955 (#468). But it turns out a number of e2e tests assume SSH access to workers (e.g. here), and we don't have time to fix those tests now. We'll remove this once the tests have been fixed.

CC @abhinavdahiya, @crawford, @smarterclayton

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Dec 17, 2018
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 17, 2018
@abhinavdahiya
Copy link
Contributor

Can we do something like this

// ConfigMasters sets the PublicIP flag and assigns a set of load balancers to the given machines
rather than changing the MachinSets function

@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor

@derekwaynecarr we’ll need to commit teams to fix this once we get the full suite switched over

Workers have not had public IPs since (at least) we moved them to
cluster-API creation in e2dc955 (pkg/asset: add ClusterK8sIO,
machines.Worker assets, 2018-10-15, openshift#468).  But it turns out a number
of e2e tests assume SSH access to workers (e.g. [1]), and we don't
have time to fix those tests now.  We'll remove this once the tests
have been fixed.

[1]: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/v1.13.1/test/e2e/node/ssh.go#L43
@wking wking force-pushed the aws-public-worker-ips branch from f490402 to 0055276 Compare December 17, 2018 07:49
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Dec 17, 2018
@wking
Copy link
Member Author

wking commented Dec 17, 2018

Can we do something like this...

Sure. Done in f490402 -> 0055276.

@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor

When this merges I'll kick another e2e-aws-all run.

@staebler
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 17, 2018
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: staebler, wking

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants