-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 226
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
OCPBUGS-38335: Revert "use update only secret-apply for cert rotation logic" #1773
OCPBUGS-38335: Revert "use update only secret-apply for cert rotation logic" #1773
Conversation
This reverts commit 96e8597.
@vrutkovs: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-38335, which is valid. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
Have we also fixed the issue of new secrets being created with the old type and then immediately migrated to the new type ? IIRC there were at least 2 secrets (etcd-o, kcm-o). The other question is what is the plan for the carry we have in o/k? |
Also how do we know that all secrets were migrated ? To we have a metrics for that ? |
@vrutkovs: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
This was tested by QE by upgrading 4.6 -> 4.15 and checking if old type still exists. Telemetry won't be helpful - this issue is applicable to secrets we own and manage only |
OK, if we are sure that there are no new secrets that start with the old type then we can also remove the carry in o/k |
/lgtm |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/approve
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: p0lyn0mial, soltysh, vrutkovs The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
@vrutkovs: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-38335: Some pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: The following pull requests linked via external trackers have not merged:
These pull request must merge or be unlinked from the Jira bug in order for it to move to the next state. Once unlinked, request a bug refresh with Jira Issue OCPBUGS-38335 has not been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
/cherrypick release-4.17 |
@vrutkovs: new pull request created: #1774 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
This reverts commit 96e8597.
All
SecretTypeTLS
secrets have been migrated tokubernetes.io/tls
type on 4.15 upgrade, time to remove the deprecated setting which enables this migration. This also prevents us from landing #1772