-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
(Multi)polygon fixing effort #3908
Comments
This is great news! I really like the stats page. iD supports either old or new style multipolygons for rendering, and iD creates only the new style multipolygons when merging areas or ways, so I agree there probably isn't anything for us to do, and I'll close this here. It looks like new-style multipolygons would get a slight performance bump in iD, because |
There is a major effort going on to fix broken (multi)polygons in OSM and also to finally get rid of old-style multipolygon relations. This will hopefully lead to simpler and more efficient software. There is no immediate need for you to change anything in iD, but I would expect there to be opportunities to simplify your code and generally make life easier for you once this effort is successful.
I wanted to make you aware of the effort and get you involved in the discussions. We'd also appreciate it if you can support this effort in any way. Find all the details at http://area.jochentopf.com/. We are coordinating with other software project through our issue osmlab/fixing-polygons-in-osm#23.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: