fix(input): [input] fix textarea x-design style #2076
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve modifications to the CSS styling of textarea components in multiple Vue files, enhancing their responsiveness by adjusting widths to Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant TextArea
participant TestSuite
User->>TextArea: Input text
TextArea-->>User: Adjust width to fit-content
User->>TestSuite: Trigger test
TestSuite->>TextArea: Validate height
TestSuite-->>User: Return test result
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (4)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/input/resize-composition-api.vue (1 hunks)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/input/resize.spec.ts (2 hunks)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/input/resize.vue (1 hunks)
- packages/theme/src/textarea/index.less (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/input/resize-composition-api.vue
Additional comments not posted (4)
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/input/resize.spec.ts (1)
Line range hint
33-44: Verify the logic and functionality of the test changes.The changes in the test assertions and the selection of textarea elements need to be verified to ensure they align with the intended functionality of the textarea resizing feature. It's crucial to confirm that these changes reflect the new behavior accurately and that the test still meets its purpose.
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/input/resize.vue (1)
66-66: Approve the CSS change but verify layout integration.The change to
fit-contentfor the width of the.tiny-textareaclass is approved as it enhances the responsiveness of the component. However, it's important to verify that this change integrates well with the rest of the layout and does not introduce any issues such as overflow or misalignment.packages/theme/src/textarea/index.less (2)
Line range hint
91-202: Approve the updates to count display styles but verify impact on readability and layering.The updates to the
z-indexandline-heightproperties of the.tiny-textareacount display are approved as they likely improve readability and layering. Setting the&:beforeand&:afterpseudo-elements todisplay: none;is also approved as it may simplify the styling. However, it's important to verify that these changes do not negatively impact the readability or layering of the count display.Verification successful
Verification Successful: No Issues Found with Textarea Count Display Styles
The updates to the
z-indexandline-heightproperties, as well as the removal of pseudo-elements for the textarea count display, do not negatively impact readability or layering. The changes are consistent with the intended styling improvements.
- The class
.@{input-prefix-cls}__countinpackages/theme/src/textarea/index.lessis responsible for the relevant styles.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of the updated count display styles on readability and layering. # Test: Search for issues related to the updated count display styles. Expect: No negative impact on readability or layering. rg --type less -A 5 $'.tiny-textarea__count'Length of output: 43
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any classes or elements related to `textarea` and `count` in LESS files to identify the correct selector. rg --type less 'textarea' -A 5 rg --type less 'count' -A 5Length of output: 98364
31-53: Approve the addition of pseudo-elements but verify visual and functional impact.The addition of the
&:beforeand&:afterpseudo-elements to the.tiny-textareaclass is approved as they enhance the visual appeal. However, it's important to verify that these elements do not interfere with the textarea's functionality or cause any layout issues.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/input/slot.spec.ts (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (4)
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/input/slot.spec.ts (4)
7-7: Improved locator scoping.The introduction of the
demolocator to target the#slotelement is a good practice. It helps in reducing the scope of element searches, which can improve test reliability by avoiding unintended element selections.
9-9: Context-specific locator for prefix.Using the
demolocator to derive theprefixlocator ensures that the test is specific to the context of the#slotelement. The immediate visibility check is a good practice to confirm that the UI is rendering as expected.
12-12: Consistent locator scoping for append.The use of the
demolocator to derive theappendlocator maintains consistency and specificity in the test. The visibility check for the append element is crucial for verifying the correct rendering of the UI.
15-18: Effective locator scoping for prepend and suffix.The consistent use of the
demolocator to derive both theprependandsuffixlocators ensures that the test is specific and accurate. The visibility checks for both elements are essential for verifying the correct rendering of the UI components.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- packages/theme/src/textarea/index.less (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- packages/theme/src/textarea/index.less
PR
PR Checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
PR Type
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
What is the current behavior?
Issue Number: N/A
What is the new behavior?
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Style