Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(image): [iamge] Fix bug regarding image links #2188

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 26, 2024
Merged

Conversation

Youyou-smiles
Copy link
Collaborator

@Youyou-smiles Youyou-smiles commented Sep 25, 2024

PR

PR Checklist

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

  • The commit message follows our Commit Message Guidelines
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)

PR Type

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

  • Bugfix
  • Feature
  • Code style update (formatting, local variables)
  • Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
  • Build related changes
  • CI related changes
  • Documentation content changes
  • Other... Please describe:

What is the current behavior?

Issue Number: N/A

What is the new behavior?

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No

Other information

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Updated the error background image for image components to display a specific base64-encoded JPEG image, enhancing visual feedback for users when image loading fails.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 25, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a change to the CSS variable --ti-image-error-bg-image-url in the vars.less file. The variable's value has been updated from a non-existent image to a specific base64-encoded JPEG image, which modifies how image errors are visually represented in the application.

Changes

File Change Summary
packages/theme/src/image/vars.less Updated variable --ti-image-error-bg-image-url from none;base64,... to url('data:image/jpeg;base64,...')

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

bug

Suggested reviewers

  • zzcr

Poem

In a world of images, bright and clear,
A rabbit hops forth, spreading cheer.
With a base64 hug for errors that show,
Now every mishap can sparkle and glow!
So let’s celebrate this change with delight,
For even the bunnies love things done right! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the enhancement New feature or request (功能增强) label Sep 25, 2024
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
packages/theme/src/image/vars.less (1)

25-25: Approve the change, but consider performance implications.

The change from none;base64,... to a valid base64-encoded image URL is correct and fixes the issue with image links. This is a definite improvement as the previous value was invalid CSS.

However, consider the following suggestions for potential future improvements:

  1. The base64-encoded image is quite large. This might impact the loading time of your CSS file. Consider using an external image file instead, which can be cached separately and potentially improve performance.

  2. If you decide to keep the base64 encoding, you might want to optimize the image to reduce its size without significantly impacting quality.

  3. Ensure that this background image is essential for all use cases. If it's only needed in specific scenarios, consider applying it more selectively to improve performance for cases where it's not required.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between d567a94 and 094a96b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • packages/theme/src/image/vars.less (1 hunks)

@zzcr zzcr merged commit f6dc726 into dev Sep 26, 2024
5 of 7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request (功能增强)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants